Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational institution - IELTS Composition and Educational Analysis
IELTS Composition and Educational Analysis
Education is a hot topic in IELTS writing, so I won't say much. Let's take a look at the IELTS composition and the analysis on education I shared with you.

Topics of IELTS writing education

1. What should education include?

Subject: It is generally believed that education is essential for personal development and social well-being. To realize these two functions, what should education include?

Tip: This topic focuses on two major functions of education (individual and society). If you prepare this article, you can deal with the biggest branch of the education topic-the function of education, so that you can change with the same. From a social point of view, it can promote economic development, increase social mobility and maintain social stability. For individuals, you can change your thinking mode, which is conducive to employment and convenient life.

Subtitle: Should universities teach theoretical knowledge or practical skills? Should universities train students to become qualified citizens or benefit themselves? Is it the best way to prepare for your future career to go to college or leave school as soon as possible to accumulate work experience? Should universities expand their enrollment? Should middle schools provide general education or junior college education? Do you want to extend the period of compulsory education? Do you want to make it more convenient for rural students to go to school? Should teachers teach students how to judge right and wrong?

2. Who will choose the subjects of the school?

Subject: Some people think that the government should decide which subjects students should study in universities, while others think that students should be allowed to apply for their favorite subjects. Discuss these two views and give your opinion.

Tip: This kind of topic adopts the strategy of "double criticism" because the two choices provided in the topic are often wrong.

Sub-topic 1: Does the government choose courses or teachers choose courses? Do students choose all subjects or according to their interests?

Sub-topic 2: Only subjects are important, but classes such as physical education and music are not. Do you agree? Do you want to study international news? Do you want to study history? Do you want to learn a foreign language in middle school? Do you want to study such a subject as philosophy of mathematics?

Tip: Sub-topic 2 has little connection with the subject, so it is necessary to prepare the respective advantages of these subjects.

3. What kind of teaching method is the best?

Subject: Many people use distance learning projects (learning materials posting, TV, Internet, etc.). ) studying at home, but some people think it can't bring benefits like going to college. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?

Tip: The biggest advantage of distance education lies in three things: anyone, anywhere and anytime. The disadvantage is the lack of teacher-student interaction and moral guidance, because without physical education class, sitting in front of the computer for a long time will lead to health problems.

Subtitle: Are private schools good? How about studying abroad? Do you want to divide the fast class and the slow class? Is it better to study in groups or alone?

4. Who will pay the tuition?

Some people think that college students should pay all the expenses of students, because college education will only benefit students, not the whole society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Tip: All these topics have a common feature: higher education is only beneficial to students themselves, so students should pay for higher education themselves. The writing of such topics is very regular. Just refute this reason first, and then explain the consequences of students paying their own tuition.

Sub-question: Should the government pay for students? The disadvantage is that it brings economic burden to the government. This kind of topic is written in the same way as other government topics.

5. Family education

Theme: Some people say that children should be the rules of parents and teachers, while others think that if children are given too much control, they will not be prepared for their adult life. Discuss and give your opinion.

Tip: Just write down their respective benefits. The final conclusion is that they should be taught to distinguish right from wrong at an early age, and they should be punished for doing wrong, but enough is enough and let their hobbies develop freely.

Sub-question: Do children from poor families take charge early? Should parents be responsible for crimes committed by five-year-old children? Do you want to send your children to school as soon as possible? Do teachers play a greater role than parents in children's intellectual and social development? What are the advantages and disadvantages of peer pressure?

Topics on IELTS writing education

Topic analysis: Students in schools or universities learn more from teachers' classes than from other resources (such as Internet or TV). Do you agree or disagree?

This kind of topic has appeared many times in the examination room, so we must carefully review this frequently-occurring topic. Maybe you can get high marks in your composition by copying exercises or classes in the examination room.

The first paragraph of the article structure: the first paragraph leads to my own point of view, that is, I can learn more knowledge from the teacher.

The second paragraph: The first argument holds that learning is not only a simple transfer of learning knowledge, but also an interaction between teachers and students.

The second view is that teachers can not only learn knowledge, but also provide supervision for students. The fourth paragraph: rebuttal paragraph, which shows that students can also learn from other resources. The fifth paragraph: natural ending, reaffirming the theme.

Fan Wen:

The latest understanding of learning and cutting-edge technology. Welcome an era in which students can acquire knowledge in many ways. . Although there are other ways to acquire knowledge and information, I still think students can learn more from teachers than other resources. To some extent, learning is not a one-way knowledge input, but a process of interaction between teachers and students. In the traditional teaching and learning mode, teachers and students coexist in an environment where they can interact in time. This means that teachers can understand students' shortcomings and advantages more comprehensively and directly, which ensures that students can learn more from courses tailored to their needs. Obviously, students can get more knowledge from their teachers, because teachers are not only craftsmen (craftsmen, craftsmen) who impart knowledge (but also supervisors or guardians).

Especially when students lack self-discipline and are prone to go astray. Without the supervision and guidance of teachers. In contrast, other learning resources, such as Internet and TV, may sometimes distract students, because a large amount of irrelevant information will destroy (weaken) their learning efficiency and make students learn less. It is also true that students are likely to learn more from other resources. Internet and TV are two kinds of media, which are rich in (many) knowledge and information from science and humanities.

They are also accessible platforms for students in remote areas. The teaching resources there are not as essential (sufficient) as those in developed areas. It is difficult for other learning resources to challenge the dominant position of teachers. In a word, teachers are still the main source of knowledge for students, although the influence of other learning resources cannot be underestimated.

Model essay on IELTS composition education

Subject: Universities should accept the same number of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Fan Wen:

Although gender equality in society is a commendable concept, I think it will be more practical to adjust the courses with serious gender imbalance more moderately than to strictly implement the 50/50 balance in all university courses.

Some people think that women are underrepresented in certain occupations, such as top management and engineering, while others think that society will get better services if more men are engaged in certain occupations, such as nursing, translation and primary school teaching. Both groups believe that not only the competition for university places, but also social stereotypes have played a role; In other words, if we can see a more balanced workforce, then more young people will think that it is socially acceptable for them to follow this practice and enter occupations traditionally related to the opposite sex.

I agree with these views, but correcting gender inequality and imbalance in the workplace cannot only happen in universities-the whole society should also make changes, including pre-university education. In addition, a strict 50/50 gender balance is suddenly enforced in college classes, usually the ratio of male to female is 80/20, which may cause many high-quality and motivated men to lose to some women, who are not suitable for these courses academically, and may not be interested in these occupations.

On the other hand, if the last class allocation of 1.0% is reserved for the "minority" sex in the seriously unbalanced class, and if academic standards are not seriously damaged in the process, then I believe society will benefit.