? In recent years, with the popularization of educational informatization, various micro-course competitions have become more and more frequent, but there are always teachers who are confused: they have participated in many large and small competitions, but their gains are not proportional to their efforts, and their micro-courses are not bad. Why are there no judges who know Pearl, and there should be no "shady" among them? In fact, there is no "shady", but it is necessary to let you know the "inside story"!

? The judges believe that there are not many entries that fully meet the entry standards and rules every year, and too many teachers unconsciously step into the minefield because some small problems pass by the grand prize! The gap between you and the grand prize may be that you don't know a little "inside story"!

? I didn't pay attention to these details. Once you step on the thunder, just hit it!

Entries submitted for more than 10 minutes?

Does the submitted work belong to the wrong category?

Is the micro-lesson picture ugly, incomplete, fuzzy and inverted?

Does the video have noise, noise, voice-over, etc.

The topic is too broad, or the topic does not highlight the content of the micro-course?

? ? Copying or borrowing too much?

Excellent micro-courses should be "short and pithy", but what should we do to make our works have a qualitative leap?

? Obstacles to winning micro-courses:

? Improper topic selection and emphasis.

? The structural design of micro-course is unreasonable.

? Technical defects in video shooting and production

? Lack of originality in form and single form of expression.

? Teachers, don't take it lightly. Maybe you accidentally made a "big taboo" in the game. It's time to give your micro-course a comprehensive test, which is also one of the effective ways to improve your business ability. I won't run with you next time