If I were allowed to educate myself by stages, I would definitely start with the simplest one: preschool education-basic education-secondary education-higher education. Another version is: family education-school education-social education stage. If it is more advanced, it is: acquiring knowledge-applying knowledge-creating knowledge.
I said three versions, the first and the second are known to all, which makes no sense.
Compared with the knowledge points in 1, my third edition does not highlight the object of education-the change of people, but only considers the contribution to existing knowledge, and the purpose of education is to change people.
Compared with knowledge points, my third edition has one thing in common: the main contents of each stage are not separated, but infiltrated each other.
(1) Tell your own experience.
I studied continuously until I became a doctor in the second year, and I never reflected. I'm always in a state of not knowing what I don't know. After studying abroad, I entered the stage of reflective cognition and began to reflect on why I could never write a paper.
After becoming a teacher, I integrated my five-question reflection into academic evaluation, trying to build a developmental academic evaluation scheme. At the same time, aiming at the problem that many students and I can't learn, we developed the course of learning psychology. With a round of iterative upgrading, I entered the interest-driven accumulation stage, which is also the current accumulation stage. So what I'm showing you today is what I accumulated there.
It should be noted that since I began to reflect, my mentality has been upgraded, because I constantly examine and correct my three views, so that I will not be so stupid all the time.
(2) Other relevant knowledge
This knowledge point is related to the five-question reflection report. 1 The answer is genetic learning; The answers to the second and third questions are reflective cognition; The fourth and fifth questions are exploratory integration, but the five-question reflection is integrated around a knowledge point, not around a specific problem.
If you continue to write five questions in your field of interest, that is, interest-driven accumulation, and sooner or later you will become an expert. I feel that I am now an expert in five-question reflection report and five-question evaluation. Because I wrote almost 200 articles myself and reviewed 2000 articles. No one can have this size.
Of course, in the process of writing five questions, my mentality is also upgrading, because the way I look at the world and think is changing. Writing here, I suddenly found that writing a five-question reflection report can get through all stages of education and finally make my life meaningful and valuable! God, how can I be so powerful that I can bend my back!
This knowledge point is related to the manifestation of tacit knowledge. In the stage of inheritance learning, all the knowledge I have learned is explicit. But in the stage of reflective cognition, a lot of knowledge is implicit, but it is also crucial, such as knowledge about yourself.
This knowledge is often discovered in the process of practice, and it cannot be discovered without practice. If you don't reflect, even if others manifest them and tell you clearly, you won't think it is a piece of knowledge, but you just can't see it yourself. So I think reflective cognition and explicit tacit knowledge are the same thing.
(1) Explain the phenomenon
Why is learning in primary and secondary schools so boring? Because this stage is dominated by genetic learning, the commonly used teaching methods are not scientific enough, ignoring reflection and inquiry, and interest-driven and mental improvement are not the focus of teachers and parents at all.
Why do so many people suffer from "hollow disease"? Because in the process of their education, these people have only increased their knowledge and skills, not driven by interests, so they feel that everything is meaningless and almost no longer look for it.
Why do so many people like to nag? Because I didn't look at each other's reaction, I didn't reflect on whether my point of view needed to be conveyed and whether it was conveyed effectively. This is caused by not reflecting on cognition.
Why do so many people get high marks and low energy? Because there is no comparison with the people around me, there is no reflection on whether the way of doing things is appropriate. This is also caused by not reflecting on cognition.
Why do we have so few original innovations? Because everyone only studies one major and doesn't like reading, the scope of knowledge is very narrow, knowledge can't be transferred far away, and exploratory integration is out of the question, so the so-called innovation is mostly tinkering around the edges. Because I think innovation is the result of exploratory integration. In this way, I also understand why our country should carry out "four innovations" and why xipu should advocate integrated education.
(2) Optimizing decision-making
Looking back on the education I have received for so many years, most of the time I am only in the stage of inherited learning, and reflective cognition has only begun in recent years. This is really an afterthought. Therefore, if the idea of "no need to write a five-question reflection report" pops up in the future, you should brake in time to avoid returning to the stage of inherited learning.
At the same time, the idea of braking is needed, and "all doctors are already very good" and "after reading so many books, this person is really good". All these ideas regard education only as a stage of inherited learning, so they are resolutely abandoned.
No longer argue with people about the topic of "reading is stupid", because the person who said this sentence is emphasizing that education is not only reading (genetic learning), but also a higher level, such as reflective cognition, interest-driven accumulation and upgrading of mental model.
In addition, I integrated the five-question reflection report into the academic evaluation, which is an exploratory integration and has won the prize and tasted the sweetness. In the future, we should continue to integrate the five-question reflection report into other fields, such as teacher training evaluation, enterprise employee training evaluation, postgraduate training and so on.
In fact, the course "Learning Psychology" that I offer is also an exploratory integration, an integration of related theories and reflective learning, an integration of knowledge acquisition and knowledge application, and an integration of high school theories and examples of folk masters. More importantly, I integrated xipu's idea of co-creation, and let teachers and students jointly create knowledge of individual cognitive differences and individual cognitive differences, which is the integration of teachers' experience and students' experience. Of course, the core is the integration of students' "inability to learn" and the knowledge and skills learned in the course.
In the future, we should dabble more and try this cross-disciplinary integration to make innovation have a routine. I think the way to implement this idea is to ask yourself this question as a normal question. Can this be integrated into other fields? Or, how should I use it?