Examination-oriented education is a strange phenomenon. It doesn't depend on what skills students should learn to help them learn, and then use some judgmental evaluation methods to find out whether students have mastered these skills. The teachers are encouraged by this thorough subversion process. First, look at an experiment with commercial value. Then he got the skills he needed without mastering reading, speaking and math, but he can get good grades in this exam. In the end, the students only learned the test-taking skills.
The ability to read, write and calculate means the ability to get high marks in standardized tests. However, just teaching (students) test-taking skills can't improve their reading and writing skills. So be careful not to misunderstand the skills of preparing for the exam and really master it. A lot of discussion about basic skills has led to this great confusion. Because people are troubled by exams, they don't care about the nature and quality of teaching.