The classmate tried to explain the reason to the teacher because he forgot to hand in his homework. Later, the substitute teacher Ma said that this classmate could write an article to demonstrate the rationality of his late homework, so this classmate really wrote "On the Rationality of Late Homework". Unexpectedly, the teacher also gave this classmate a "Classified Analysis of Late Homework Cases".
The full text is as follows:
As a student majoring in law, this classmate's practice is very good. Most of us may want to explain this situation to the teacher, but if the teacher really disagrees, we will often stop insisting, let alone arguing with the teacher with professional knowledge.
However, in contrast, the teacher's response made me even more amazing.
In the face of this classmate's explanation, he refused at first, but at the beginning of this classmate's debate with professional knowledge such as "major misunderstanding" and "risk sharing", he also gave the same response, demonstrating the possibility that major misunderstanding does not exist with the number of classes, and finally giving this classmate a chance to give an answer in the form of a paper after this classmate's "struggle".
It is the luck of this classmate, the school and the education to have such a teacher.
The purpose of national education is to let more outstanding people into the torrent of socialist construction, and these outstanding people should not only master the knowledge in textbooks, but also know how to use it.
The same is true of the legal profession.
In real life, there are often many more complicated situations than in books. If we just follow the book, the rule of law in our country will be cold.
Take the hot search for this year's French final exam as an example. Many netizens said that the questioner's thoughts are even bloodier than the screenwriter. How can those topics in real life be so coincidental? But it could really be such a coincidence. After all, life is the bloodiest thing, and you'll never guess how many strange things are behind a case.
The communication between people is a complex relationship, which is even more complicated with various interests and conflicts. The seemingly bloody relationships in the exam are just to test whether you have the most basic logical analysis ability of a legal person.
When I did the real question for the first time, I read it twice and didn't understand the relationship between the characters. Now I'm scared when I hear a, b, d and ABCD.
But no road is smooth. What's more, the construction of the rule of law is of great significance to China's modernization drive, and we need such outstanding talents who are not constrained by books.
On the other hand, it seems to be a trivial matter between the teacher and the classmate, but in fact, as the teacher finally said, "I insist only to leave a bottom line for other students who choose courses, and one is called a fair bottom line." Perhaps many people think that it does not interfere in other people's affairs, talking about fairness and unfairness, and the rules are irregular. In fact, the more trivial things are, the more important are fairness and rules. If you break the rules yourself, countless people may break the rules next, and then the rules are no longer rules.
"Although things are small, they are not light." Whether we are legal persons or not, we should have enough respect for the rules.
If you don't follow the rules, you can't be Fiona Fang.