Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational institution - Full-time work is not allowed as a restrictive condition. Is this rule feasible?
Full-time work is not allowed as a restrictive condition. Is this rule feasible?
The short-term feasibility of this regulation is not strong, but long-term adherence may get the desired results.

First of all, recruitment is a very subjective matter.

Whether an enterprise decides to hire a person is judged subjectively by hr, company executives and others. It is not clear whether they have considered the full-time factor in their judgment. They turned down a job seeker, perhaps because the job seeker was not full-time, or just because the job seeker's performance in the interview did not meet the company's expectations.

Secondly, this provision will bring some benefits in the short term.

In view of this regulation, the company may lower the requirements for full-time when screening resumes, which correspondingly increases the chances of part-time candidates entering the interview circle. At this time, those part-time interviewers with excellent personal ability can get the opportunity to express themselves and avoid the omission of outstanding talents.

But the premise is that this interviewer is really excellent, much better than other full-time applicants. If two candidates with similar ability, speech and image compete for a position, I think the background of full-time background may play a decisive role in the final decision of the employer.

Thirdly, the long-term implementation of this regulation will gradually change people's ideas.

The appearance of this provision actually reflects the change of people's mentality and concept. Why is this regulation introduced? Because someone has paid attention to this problem. The implementation of this regulation by the Ministry of Education means that the concern for full-time has risen to the national level.

We can imagine that in the future, informal and accepting employers will first recognize this concept, and then when this concept brings benefits to these employers, some conservative and traditional employers will gradually accept this concept, and finally, this concept will be deeply rooted in the hearts of the people in the long process of osmosis.

Of course, this is an idealized development, provided that this regulation is really implemented, and those part-time candidates have not disappointed the employers who first accepted them.

Finally, improving yourself is always the most effective way.

In a word, for recruiters, no matter what the rules are, improving their ability is the most important thing. Only when you are truly outstanding can you go further on your career path.