The person in charge of the First Division of Basic Education of the Ministry of Education pointed out that in view of the long-standing common phenomenon that the workload of class teachers is too heavy, the regulations require that "the workload of class teachers should be included in the basic workload of teachers according to half of the workload of local teachers' standard class hours, and it is clear that class teachers should spend half of their time as class teachers, requiring all localities to reasonably arrange the workload of class teachers so that they can have the energy to care about the ideological and moral status, physical and mental health status and other aspects of development of each student. "
The person in charge pointed out that in today's emphasis on respecting students and safeguarding students' rights, teachers, especially class teachers, dare not manage students, dare not criticize and educate students, and dare not let themselves go. The "Regulations" clarify: "The class teacher has the right to criticize and educate the students in the daily education and teaching management, and take appropriate measures to educate them."
(Source: Xinhuanet Comprehensive Location: Xinhuanet Home-Xinhua Education Topic: Ministry of Education: Primary and secondary school class teachers need to be employed and have the right to criticize students on August 24, 2009 07: 19:44)
/edu/2009-08/24/content _ 1 1932870 _ 1 . htm
Most laws and regulations will be criticized by everyone in the freshman period, and some people will agree with them. This seems to be an unshakable law. Without exception, in view of the development requirements of basic education in the new period, the "Regulations on the Work of Class Teachers in Primary and Secondary Schools" recently issued by the Ministry of Education has also experienced the impact of various viewpoints.
In the "Regulations", first of all, it is worthy of recognition that the attention to the class teacher and the guarantee of treatment can strengthen the education of children! However, it is doubtful that Article 16 clearly states that "class teachers have the right to criticize and educate students in an appropriate way". Faced with this sword issued by the Ministry of Education to the head teachers of primary and secondary schools, I want to ask a fool: Does the Ministry of Education stipulate that the head teachers have the right to criticize, and can it work?
It is not difficult to see that the reason why the Ministry of Education clearly points out in the regulations that "the class teacher has the right to criticize and educate students in an appropriate way in the daily education and teaching management" is because "today, with the emphasis on respecting students and safeguarding students' rights, teachers, especially class teachers, dare not control students, dare not criticize and educate students, and dare not let themselves go". However, when the head teacher has this "king-beating" according to the regulations, can it have the ideal effect? To put it bluntly, does the Ministry of Education stipulate that the head teacher has the right to criticize in order to manage the students and play a role? I don't think so! Fool: I think that the reason why the class teacher "dare not control the students, dare not criticize and educate the students, and let the students go" is not that they have no right to criticize and educate!
The reason why the class teacher "dare not manage the students, dare not criticize and educate the students, and let the students go" is because some teachers' ethics have fallen! Although these teachers are few, the side effects are extremely bad! In reality, there are very few teachers with low morality. They only regard the position of teacher as a rice bowl and have no other ideas about this bowl of rice. In these people's minds, there is no difference between teaching people and misleading children. With these ideas, and now they don't pursue the enrollment rate and are not allowed to rank second, can they not let their students go? In the past, when teachers didn't have this power, they followed the traditional morality of "master and apprentice are like father and son", "illuminate others" and "the silkworm dies and the candle burns out at night", and they still cultivated a batch of talents seriously and responsibly! Look now, the temptation of the world of flowers and flowers, unwilling to be lonely; The impact of reality and the temptation of money make it difficult for some people to stand on the podium of "The closest relatives" and to insist on having the reputation of being full of peaches and plums! In reality, how many teachers were there in Cao Ying and Han Dynasty? How many teachers are bosses or run their own private training classes and cram schools while teaching? How many class teachers are unwilling to do it, regard teaching as a mere formality, regard teaching as a sideline and serve as a tool to contact students' parents? Is it because they have no right to criticize that they don't care about students? Even if we give them the right to criticize, can they educate our children well?
The reason why class teachers "dare not take charge of students, criticize and educate students, and dare not indulge students" is that the rights and interests of some teachers cannot be effectively guaranteed. In reality, we constantly protect the rights and interests of minors, but to a certain extent, we relatively ignore the rights and interests of teachers. When educational criticism causes conflicts between teachers and students, if the victim is a teacher, who will better safeguard the rights of teachers? In reality, in many places, most schools come forward to put pressure on both sides and calm down disputes! Although this situation is rare, but the impact is not small! In this case, there are many spoiled children in reality, and bad teachers will get into trouble! In this case, there is no pressure of enrollment rate and ranking, and students love to learn! In this case, does the teacher dare to control the students? Why criticize and educate students? Also, by contrast, teachers' salaries are still relatively low and serious. If teachers are worried about their livelihood, if they watch people in other units get on the bus, get on the BMW and live in a foreign building, but keep a small sum of money to contribute, in this case, in the absence of hard indicators, it is better to be less idle. Who wants to take care of students and criticize them?
The reason why class teachers "dare not take care of students, criticize and educate students, and indulge students" is again because of the influence of social atmosphere and some people's inadaptability and misunderstanding to the current students' burden reduction and quality education transition period. Undeniably, some bad social atmosphere is eroding our school, and the overall quality of students is also undergoing subtle changes. The difficulty of obtaining employment is a blow, and the foolish idea that reading is useless is also on the rise! In this case, the teacher also has the difficulties of the teacher! Also, at present, our education is in a transitional period, and many teachers still can't deeply understand students' burden reduction and quality education, which leads to students' burden reduction and quality education is to reduce their responsibilities, that is, to ignore students! Under this illusion, teachers, especially class teachers, naturally have the responsibility to criticize education, and they don't want to use it!
Well, the analysis is here, let's go back to the theme of this article. From our analysis, we can draw a conclusion: the reason why the class teacher "dare not control the students, dare not criticize and educate the students, and let the students go" is not because he has no right to criticize! With this conclusion, the Ministry of Education intends to use the regulations to give the class teacher the right to criticize to solve the problem that the class teacher "dare not control the students, dare not criticize and educate the students, and let the students go". Can it work? Can it work? Isn't this "treating the headache and treating the foot pain"? Isn't this unnecessary? In addition, the class teacher has the power to manage students. What about the other teachers? Once all the problems are pushed to the class teacher, don't other teachers have an excuse to ignore the students? Can the class teacher manage it?
A lot of words, let's reiterate and summarize. The reason why the class teacher "dare not control the students, dare not criticize and educate the students, and let the students go" is not because he has no right to criticize! The fundamental reasons are: the decline of teachers' morality, the lack of protection of rights and interests, the influence of social atmosphere and the misunderstanding of students' burden reduction! In order to solve this problem, we must improve teachers' professional ethics, strengthen the protection of teachers' rights and interests, including wages and benefits, create a good social atmosphere, and form an atmosphere of respecting teachers and attaching importance to education, so that teachers can truly spend the transition period of education in concept, reduce the burden on students and not reduce their responsibilities, and establish a scientific assessment mechanism and education mechanism in time! Only in this way can we teach our next generation well and effectively "manage" our students!
Therefore, to solve these problems of "dare not take care of students, dare not criticize and educate students, and indulge students", only relying on the Ministry of Education to stipulate that the class teacher has the right to criticize is an act of throwing doctors in the wrong place and prescribing prescriptions indiscriminately, which can't grasp the key points and won't work!