What is the educational topic after reading a book? It comes from the conclusion of Dewey's speech, and the author breaks it down into four questions:
1, what is education?
2. What is the essence of education without any modification?
3. What does the purity and simplicity of education mean?
4. Under what conditions can education become a reality, not just a name or slogan?
Around these four issues, the author has made a detailed discussion at different levels. This book is so wonderful that every chapter in it can be used as a topic to write lengthy reading notes. However, here we only discuss the deepest feelings of readers.
Since the advent of pedagogy, there has been a puzzle, which has puzzled me for a long time, causing me to fall into a puzzle when reading, studying and even educating my own children or self-education, that is, what education should be like and what kind of education is good, correct and effective. I grew up under the training of exam-oriented education. I am used to doing everything with a standard and a definite and unique answer, and then I am required to do things according to this standard and answer, including studying and learning. However, pedagogy is an elusive knowledge, and there is no unique answer. Various theories are different from the educational practice of individuals or educational groups. With the deepening of study, it is more and more difficult for me to grasp the essence of education. When I try to find answers from real life, I often feel as confused as walking into a maze.
I was a little disappointed when I first got this book. Compared with many books on education, this book is very thin. After browsing the catalogue, this disappointment is even worse. What is the conclusion of the last chapter of this book? Education is a moral cause? This seems to have returned to an old topic that cannot be demonstrated clearly. Fortunately, I didn't shelve this book because of my superficial judgment.
I have to say, this is really a good book. The author is rigorous in logic and argument. You can feel the author's profound foundation. As the book says, this is the result of the author's years of thinking. This book inspired me a lot. The author gave up the method of drawing conclusions from the beginning. On the contrary, he described his thinking process in detail bit by bit, how he decomposed these problems, how to seek arguments, and then overturned the arguments, and then drew conclusions, including thinking and criticizing Dewey's own early views. Through this process, I can see how the master analyzes problems, looks for arguments, and finally constructs his own views. The whole process of reading seems to be thinking with the master and seeking the ultimate answer of education together.
When discussing the essence of education, Jackson proposed to put? Essence? With what? Existence? Distinguish. This is also a problem that has been bothering me for a long time. How does education solve the contradiction between sublime and secular? Jackson thinks? What educational practice presents to interested observers is a wonderful mixture of essential and non-essential elements. He provided a hodgepodge of inevitable truth and accidental truth, or a hodgepodge of essential truth and non-essential truth. ? So how to distinguish accidental truth from internal truth? The necessary truth? And then what? Inner truth? Quoted from P69 and P22 respectively, I don't know whether the translator's translation is different or the author's own meaning is different. There are subtle differences between them. In the analysis of the two descriptions of the word (assuming for the time being that they refer to the same), Jackson pointed out? From understanding the actual situation of things to understanding the supposed situation of things, we not only need to make an empirical investigation, but also need to go beyond the experience itself and enter a realm called transcendence and even metaphysics. ?
Throughout the book, we can feel the author's overflowing personal feelings and tendencies. From an academic point of view, this should not be, but what does it matter? As the author explains in the book, this is the author's own subjective truth, and? The teacher's goal is to let the students master whatever knowledge he teaches. ? Jackson called this process? Selling the truth In this process, teachers will produce two strategies? Accept? And then what? Shape? Teachers should first accept students, including listening, observing and understanding, and then cultivate students by transferring knowledge, correcting mistakes and setting an example. In this process, the teacher just put his personal knowledge? Trafficking in human beings? Give it to students, and students will gradually transform it into their own personal knowledge through thinking and feeling. Jackson attributed this process to? Cancel, keep, promote? It is a process of rational thinking, dialectical choice and innovative development after students accept teachers' knowledge. In the last chapter of the article, Jackson criticized? Inform? Better than what? Shape? The teaching goal of. Jackson thinks there is a need between teachers and students? Mutual recognition? This kind of recognition is equal, two-way, and there is emotional communication between them, so that teachers can influence students? Shape? Function, not simple? Inform? . And then what? Love? It is an important emotional bond between teachers and students. Take the lead in teaching and learning? .
What is the title of the last chapter of this book? Education is a moral cause? But Jackson was right? Moral reasons? This word has no definition or description. What did the author say? Moral reasons? There is no clear explanation of what it refers to, and the reader can only make a rough judgment based on the description in the article and his own speculation. The first is a responsibility. The previous generation has the responsibility to pass on knowledge to the next generation, or the owner of knowledge has the responsibility to pass on what he has learned to people who don't know. Secondly, the person in charge of delivery wants to send what he thinks? Valuable? .
What's interesting is what Jackson used here? Pass it on? Pass? 、? Transmission? What did you use before? Selling the truth These words show the equal relationship between the two, and there is no distinction between inferiority and authority. It's like someone owns something and the owner gives it to someone else. As for how the recipient understands, uses and improves this thing, it is the recipient's personal business. Students' love and gratitude for the teacher in the process of transmission is the embodiment of emotional communication between the sender and the receiver, and the influence of the teacher's personality charm on the students. The morality of education is ultimately reflected in making the educated better, making our social environment better, and ultimately making our world better.
At the end of the book, Jackson points out? Will the ideal of education change with time? And everyone can also think and define their own educational beliefs, although these definitions are different, which is not important. What is important is that the ideal of education can advance in many meditations.
When the book turned to the last page, I closed the book and meditated. I seem to understand the essence of education in books, but I don't seem to understand it. Perhaps this is the pursuit of truth, as written in the author's book. The highest truth of education has no tangible form of existence and cannot be verified by experience. Only consider, discuss and instruct. ? The pursuit of truth is to find the direction for our way forward. It guides us to move forward and then move forward. Over time, the truth may change, but what does it matter? The important thing is that we have been moving forward.
What is the education after studying? The following summer, after busy housework, I carefully read What is Education edited by Philip Jackson. I am deeply ashamed of the teaching skills and teaching reflection in it. We have always followed the original experience track, thinking that we have taught knowledge to students without reservation, that's all, that's enough, but Jackson used many philosophers' ideas to clarify how a society can pass on truth and knowledge to the next generation. In other words, education is a moral cause in the final analysis.
I have the following three understandings of education:
1. Education is a process of free communication between teachers and students? People can learn about others and history as well as themselves and reality through education, and will not become tools of others' will? . Dialogue not only forms an interactive relationship between teachers and students, but also transforms knowledge into students' personal understanding and inspires and guides students' spirit through dialogue.
Second, education is the process of overall spiritual growth. Education is not only an activity to acquire knowledge and skills, but also a spiritual life in which teachers and students participate together. As a comprehensive spiritual growth process, education is a process to promote the unified development of people's knowledge, emotion and will.
Third, education is a process of individual self-education and self-realization. The process of education is to let the educated practice, learn and grow themselves in practice, and education helps individuals to be themselves freely, rather than demanding.
? Education is to educate yourself from the perspective of children without education, and all educational wisdom is uninvited. ? I appreciate this view. For a person's life, the teacher's? Teaching? It seems too short. Good students are not taught by schools. On the road of students' success, the teacher is only the stage guide. Therefore, what we have to do is to wait and wait patiently: on the premise of respecting children, give them the freedom to develop as much as possible; Cultivate children's ability to solve problems by themselves, acquire knowledge and wisdom, and cultivate their confidence and motivation for independent development.
? What is the best education? The best education is not how vivid the teaching materials are, how knowledgeable the teachers are, and how efficient the teaching methods are, but the kind of love that comes from the teacher's heart and is based on the dialogue of love: a look, a look, a gesture and a word. A teacher once described the relationship between teachers and students like this. A student is like a mirror in front of you: you are optimistic and he is lively; You make progress, he works hard; You are rigorous and he is practical; Are you depressed and he is decadent? I believe that a loving teacher, her students must be positive, confident, tolerant and friendly. No matter whether he or she is smart or not, he or she can grow up with the tolerance of the teacher's love.
Mr. Lu Xun once said that education is rooted in love? . Love is the source of education, the most basic condition of education and the driving force of education success. With love, all doubts will become firm trust, all complaints will become patient encouragement, and once-questioned eyes will be full of love persistence and expectation. It makes our education and teaching activities full of human brilliance, makes our education and teaching behavior full of artistry and creativity, and makes the harmony and unity of truth, goodness and beauty enter the campus, the classroom, the pure hearts of children and take root.
What is education? Real education is not only about reasoning, imparting knowledge, developing children's intelligence, but also the transmission of culture and spirit, making our children become powerful people inside. This is the educational ideal that you and I pursue as teachers.
What is the education after studying? The third part, What is Education, is only a pamphlet, but it contains Jaspers' most important viewpoints and expositions. This is also because education is a core issue. This book is said to be the author's reflection on German education, and at the same time, we can see some threads of European education development. It is instructive to compare the current education situation in China. The author briefly expounds the essence of education, the ideal of education, the essence of university and the ideal of university from a professional perspective, and puts forward some concrete measures for university reform, which has certain reference significance. Finally, the author thinks that the relationship between teachers and students should be equal throughout the book, and the purpose of education is to maintain independence, freedom, personal will and unremitting pursuit of truth.
What is education? Different theorists at home and abroad have different views on education. One of my favorite views is that education is communication. In China, it has always been recognized as a dizzy point of view. What aspects of education are divided into? From the birth of a child, of course, it includes prenatal education, family education, school education, social education, environmental education and so on. The metaphor of educational image is to turn a blank sheet of paper into a table, which is full of books and contains mistakes.
Tao Xingzhi: Education is based on life, for life? Life education? Cultivate people with action ability, thinking ability and creativity.
Huang Quanyu: Education? The important thing is not to load the car, but to fill the tank with oil.
Zhong Qiquan: Is education the foundation? Student development? With what? Character growth? The foundation of.
Qin Wenjun:? Education should be a door, open it, full of sunshine and flowers, which can bring confidence and happiness to children.
Einstein:? What is education? When you forget all the education, the rest is education.
Howard. Gardner: What is education? Education is to let children experience and discover what the world is like and what role educators can play.