I remember Li Yongxin of Zhonggong Education said that no matter how ever-changing the application is, the answer is still in the materials, and it must be written closely, unless the title clearly requires "using your own point of view", which is rare.

As far as you are concerned, "administrative system reform" is obviously a policy document (mainly a countermeasure). Therefore, it is necessary to summarize the shortcomings of the current administrative mechanism given in the materials, and then put forward countermeasures. Note that it can be the same as the above countermeasures. Self-innovation is easy to write a thousand words, which is beside the point of Wan Li's results. Why don't you recite some good articles before the exam? Since 2006, the application has undergone major reforms. The government has noticed that we need capable talents, not those with strong memories. Therefore, the application pays more and more attention to the investigation of ability, which is manifested in the ability to find and solve problems from materials, rather than talents who can remember. Obviously, therefore, we should honestly use syllogism to introduce the disadvantages of the current administrative mechanism in China (what is it), and then the reasons for this situation (what is it) and how we should solve it (how to do it). The whole article is done in one go, which is more reliable. The biggest advantage is that we can save the time of answering questions, straighten out our answers in a limited time and find ways to enrich them.