Teachers all know that it is more important to have two kinds of assessments every year, one is performance assessment, and the other is teacher's ethics assessment. Teachers' morality assessment and performance assessment are divided into three grades: excellent, qualified and unqualified, and these three grades are set according to a certain proportion. For example, the excellent grade accounts for about 10% of the total number of people. These two assessments are important conditions for the promotion of teachers' professional titles and the evaluation of excellent teachers. For example, if you want to promote your professional title, you need to have a teacher's ethics assessment and performance assessment within three years, and you will be excellent in one year.

Teachers' performance evaluation materials and teachers' ethics evaluation materials are generally not open, and teachers themselves and educational administrators can consult them. This can also be said to be the teacher's personal privacy. Only teachers with excellent annual assessment and professional ethics assessment will have a publicity process, which can be regarded as a kind of praise for teachers.

The book "Ou Yue Shi Dian" published in Wenzhou, Zhejiang, felt quite inappropriate after reading it. My back is cold. I'm glad I'm not a teacher here. What is the teacher's code? It is a two-dimensional code generated according to your teacher's ethics evaluation standard, which is divided into green code, yellow code and red code. The green code represents the identification of good teachers' morality and no bad records such as violation of rules and regulations; The yellow code representative was criticized, educated, admonished, ordered to check and informed criticism for violating the relevant provisions of teachers' morality and style; Red team said that he was warned, recorded, demoted, dismissed or dismissed for violating the relevant provisions of teachers' ethics.

Others can check your teacher's ethics assessment and issue a teacher's ethics health report through this code. Will this practice of making the assessment of teachers' morality almost transparent infringe on teachers' privacy?

Of course, according to the local education authorities, no one can find this code except the specific personnel in the education system. If so, what is the significance of introducing this code of ethics? Now, both the education management department and the teachers themselves can inquire about their teachers' moral assessment by logging in to the teacher management platform. Is this code just to be cool? Or is there more money and no place to spend it?

There is no problem in assessing teachers, and grading is also reasonable. If a teacher's professional ethics is assessed as unqualified, the education authorities, school leaders and teachers themselves are well aware of it, and naturally they will try their best to find the gap and actively rectify it, because they may face dismissal if they fail to pass the examination for several years in a row. If this code is inadvertently spread and the teacher's privacy is exposed, what help will it have to the teacher's growth?

Although the local education authorities say that only teachers and schools can check online, the education department is not a law enforcement department after all, and the login account and password are not confidential, so this statement is basically taken for granted.

From this, I can't help thinking of a recent incident. A female teacher in Fuquan, Fujian Province was asked to apologize publicly on TV for riding a bicycle on the sidewalk. Not only that, school leaders were also asked to apologize publicly on TV. It is certainly wrong to ride a bike on the sidewalk, but is it necessary to apologize on TV for this violation of traffic laws? Besides this teacher, did anyone else violate the traffic rules? Did they apologize on TV, too

I think in Fuquan, there must be people who violate traffic rules, and there must be many people who are more serious than riding bicycles on the sidewalk, but it is impossible for everyone to apologize on TV. Why just choose a female teacher and school leaders to apologize on TV? Is it because the teacher is a soft persimmon? Or is the requirement for teachers higher than other industries?

Let's go back to this moral principle. If we really want to be fair, open and transparent, shouldn't all industries have a set of moral standards? After all, other industries also need to have professional ethics, such as whether doctors should have medical ethics codes, whether businessmen should have business ethics codes, and whether farmers should have agricultural ethics codes.

It is necessary to strengthen the management of teachers, but whether it should be people-oriented, solicit teachers' opinions and suggestions when formulating management measures, protect teachers' personal privacy, and don't make some decisions that waste manpower, material resources and financial resources.