Original: My husband's words are not blowing. The speaker has something to say, but the speaker is hesitant. Is there any evil in words? Never evil? What does it think is different? Sound, there are also discussions? Is there no argument about it?

Is evil hidden? Evil is hidden, is it right or wrong? Is the evil of Tao going away without saving? What's wrong with keeping it? Tao is hidden in small success, and words are hidden in great glory. So there is right and wrong between Confucianism and Mohism, so it is not what is what, but what is what. If you want to be yourself, not what you are now, then you have to be clear.

That's all, that's all. You can't see yourself, but you know yourself. So: he is right, and he is right. He is, Fang Sheng said. Although Fang Sheng died, Fang Sheng died; The party cannot, the party cannot; Cause is cause, cause is not cause. So saints can't help but shine in the sky, and it's also because of it.

Yes, there are, and there are. He is also right and wrong, which is also right and wrong. If there is a kind of fruit, what is it? What if there is no fruit? He is the only one who can get this opportunity, which is called the pivot of Tao. The fulcrum starts from its ring, so it should be infinite. What is infinite, nothing is infinite. So it's brilliant.

Using referential metaphor to refer to non-reference, and not referring to non-reference with non-reference metaphor; A horse is not a horse, a horse is not a horse. Everything is a horse at the point of heaven and earth.

It's okay. It's okay. When the Tao is done, it will naturally become. Evil? However, naturally. Is it evil or not? Otherwise, it is not. Is it disgusting? Keke. Is it evil? You can't do it. What is inherent and what is inherent; If there is nothing, there is nothing. Therefore, it is the wonder of the restoration of Li and Ying, Li and Tao, and it is integrated with Tao.

Its point is also successful; Its success has also been destroyed. Everything comes to an end and becomes one. Only those who achieve their goals know that common sense is one, and they will not use it, but tolerate all kinds of mediocrity. If you are mediocre, you can use it; Use also, pass also; If you pass, you will get it; Just enough. Because it is already, it is already unknown, and this is the Tao. Trying to understand one without knowing one is called "Trident Street".

What is "Tide III"? My nephew Fu Qi said, "Three transgressions and four times". All the snipers are angry. Say, but it's four times and three times. Everyone is very happy. It is also because the name is not worthy of the name and it is used angrily. So it is called the "two lines" between saints and right and wrong.

Ancient people knew something. How bad is it? Some people think that it existed before the start, and it is too late to add it. Secondly, I thought there was something, but there was a seal before the beginning. Secondly, I thought there was a seal, but there was right and wrong before it started. Right and wrong are clear, and the Tao is lost. The loss of Tao is the achievement of love. What about success and failure?

What if you get nothing and have nothing? Gain and loss, so Zhao's guqin is also. Nothing is lost, and the Zhao family does not play drums. Zhao Wen's guqin, Shi Kuang's strategy, Keiko's foundation, and the third son's knowledge are similar! Are prosperous times, so in the last year. Only its goodness is different from another; It's also good. I want to make it clear. He is not clear, so he is hard and ignorant.

His son, on the other hand, ended up with a literary talent and nothing for life. If so, can it be described as success? Although I can do it What if it doesn't work? It has nothing to do with me. It is the honor of being suspicious, and it is also the plan of a saint. It is called "make it clear" because it is unnecessary and contains all kinds of mediocrity.

Talking and arguing are not like blowing your hair. Controversial people have different arguments, and what they say is never conclusive. Did you really say something? Still didn't say anything? They all think that their speech is different from that of a chicken. Is there really a difference, or is there no difference?

How is the avenue hidden? Is it true or false? How is speech hidden, right and wrong? How can the avenue appear and cease to exist? How can speech exist without being recognized? The avenue was covered by small successes, and the speech was covered by flashy rhetoric.

So there was a debate between Confucianism and Mohism, affirming what the other side denied and denying what the other side affirmed. If you want to affirm what the other side denies, rather than criticize what the other side affirms, then it is better to observe the true colors of things and gain insights.

Everything has its opposite, and everything has its opposite. You can't see this side from the opposite side of things, but you can know and understand it from the opposite side of things. So: one side of things comes from this side of things, and this side of things also comes from that side of things. The two opposing aspects of things coexist and depend on each other.

Even so, death comes immediately after birth and comes back to life immediately after death; Just affirm and then deny, just deny and then affirm; The right side also follows the wrong side, and the wrong side also follows the right side. Therefore, saints do not take the road of right and wrong, but observe and compare things according to their true colors, that is, according to their own modality.

This side of things is also that side of things, and that side of things is also that side of things. There is right and wrong on that side of things, and there is right and wrong on this side of things. Do things really exist on both sides of each other? Are there really no differences between the two aspects of things?

Neither has its opposite, and it is the hub of the avenue. Grasping the hub of the avenue also grasps the key of things, thus adapting to the endless changes of things. "Yes" is infinite, so is "No". Therefore, it is better to observe and understand things as they are.

It is better to use non-material elements to explain that the elements of things are not things themselves; It is better to say that a white horse is not a horse than a white horse. No matter how many elements exist in the whole nature, they are the same as elements, and no matter how many concrete images there are, all kinds of things are the same as concrete images.

Can you recognize it? There must be something certain to be recognized; Can't you approve it? There must be something that is uncertain before it can be recognized. The road comes out, and things are called out by people. What is right? What is correct is that it is correct in itself. What is incorrect?

What is incorrect is that it is not correct. How can I recognize it? Recognition lies in self-recognition. How can you not recognize it? Can't be recognized, because it is not recognized itself. Everything has a right side, everything has a right side, there is no right side, there is no right side.

Therefore, we can cite tiny grass stalks and tall court columns, ugly heads and beautiful women, as well as various strange situations such as generosity, strangeness, fraud and strangeness to illustrate this point. From the perspective of Tao, they are all interlinked and muddy. The decomposition of old things means the formation of new things, and the formation of new things means the destruction of old things.

Everything is not divided into generation and destruction, but is interconnected and integrated. Only knowledgeable people know that things are interlinked and ambiguous, so they don't have to stubbornly explain things, but should pin their views on ordinary things.

The so-called mediocre things are useless and useful; Knowing that something is useless is useful, which is called understanding; A knowledgeable person is a person who really knows the common sense of things; A correct understanding of common sense is to approach the avenue. It conforms to the original state of those interlocking and confusing things, so that you can't understand them. This is called Tao. It takes a lot of thought to realize that things are integrated and not to know that things themselves have the same characteristics and characteristics. This is called "face three". What is "three to three"?

The monkey keeper gave the monkey acorn and said, "Give three liters in the morning and four liters at night." The monkeys were very angry. The monkey keeper changed his mind and said, "Four liters in the morning and three liters at night." The monkeys all cheered. There is no loss in name, but joy and anger have changed for their own purposes, which is why. Therefore, the ancient saints were mixed, living in a state of natural balance, which was called "everything is in its proper place and I develop on my own".

In ancient times, human wisdom reached the highest level. How can we reach the highest level? At that time, some people thought that there was nothing concrete in the whole universe from the beginning. This understanding is the most remarkable and perfect, and it is also difficult to see.

Secondly, it is believed that there were things at the beginning of the universe, but everything has never been distinguished and demarcated. Secondly, although everything is different, there is never right or wrong. The exposure of right and wrong leads to the loss and defect of understanding of everything in the universe, and the concept of partiality is thus formed.

Is there really a formation and a deficit? Is there really no formation and deficit? Things have been formed and lost, so Zhao can play the piano. Without formation and lack, Zhao Wen can no longer play the piano.

Zhao Wen is good at playing the piano, Shi Kuang is good at music and rhythm, and Hui Shi is willing to speak under the buttonwood. The talents of these three gentlemen can be said to be the pinnacle! They all enjoy a high reputation, so their deeds are recorded and handed down. They all like their knowledge and skills, so they are very different from others; Just because I like my knowledge and skills, I always hope to show them.

And they did things that should not be made clear to the world, so they finally got the mystery that the color and quality of stones are independent of stones; Zhao Wen's son also inherited his father's career and accomplished nothing for life. Can this be called success? Then even if I have no achievement, I can be said to have succeeded.

Can't this be called success? Neither external things nor myself succeeded. Therefore, all kinds of deceptive rhetoric are despised and abandoned by sages. Therefore, all kinds of uselessness are pinned on usefulness, and usefulness is to observe the true colors of things and get a real understanding.