Quality education is a profound educational reform, involving a series of reforms in the field of education and the adjustment of interest relations. The fact that Shandong has issued dozens of education "tickets" a year shows that local governments, especially provincial governments, are bound to be limited in curbing the growing wind of taking exams, returning education to the function of educating people, and upholding the core values of cultivating people's personality and spirit. Promoting quality education is a long and arduous process, which requires top-down, overall design, steady progress and all-round development.
First of all, the logical order of implementing quality education is from idea to method. Since the concept of quality education was put forward in the mid-1980s, schools at all levels have been trying, but the results are not satisfactory, and most of them even go back in vain. The root of the problem still lies in the unscientific concept of educating people and educational achievements, that is, all the evaluation systems of exam-oriented education around scores and rankings. Score is not only a sharp weapon for students' future and destiny, but also the score and ranking of a class, which becomes the basis for teachers to evaluate and promote. The "heavy pressure" of parents, schools and teachers has not been alleviated. Isn't quality education an empty talk? To change this situation, we must start with firmly establishing a scientific concept of educating people and educational achievements, and optimize the education and teaching environment.
Secondly, the internal order of quality education is top-down design. After all, the examination-oriented education system corresponding to quality education is a national system with a long history. The educational concept, educational model, examination methods, teachers' salaries and benefits that are currently applicable to schools are all derived from this system. Therefore, to get rid of the hard ice of exam-oriented education, we must start with top-level design and start with higher education on the basis of renewing ideas, and we must never break through halfway and go deep alone. We must never put the cart before the horse from bottom to top. Learn from a painful experience: In 2004, because of the comprehensive implementation of quality education in Nanjing, the college entrance examination in that year suffered from waterloo, which caused dissatisfaction among parents and society and led to the return of score evaluation to the classroom.
Third, quality education is a hard exploration process. Similar to Shandong, dealing with the problems encountered in promoting quality education by means of high-pressure situation and administrative punishment may be effective temporarily, but it is not a long-term solution and cannot last long. At the same time, replacing score evaluation with comprehensive evaluation can promote the school to run in accordance with educational laws and promote the all-round development of each student. But it needs a hard transformation process, and the society's cognition of quality education also needs a period of time. In particular, the "pyramid" structure set up by the current school and the current college entrance examination system determine that the contradiction between the shortage of educational resources and the relative excess of educational demand will exist for a long time, and the single-plank bridge cannot be separated from the hero of score theory, and quality education will be subject to many constraints.
Educating people in schools is like farmers planting crops. If you miss the season, you will get nothing. If student education confuses any link, it may delay a child's life. It is better to promote quality education as a whole.