I think the standard of quality education has achievements, but it can't just be achievements. There is still no unified criterion for judging the quality of quality education, which is one of the reasons why quality education has been controversial in recent years. There are often famous schools, which are famous for maintaining a high enrollment rate every year. Because of trying quality education, the enrollment rate has dropped seriously, and the number of high-level students has decreased greatly. On the contrary, because some schools imitate the balanced model, the enrollment rate is increasing year by year, and even the brands with low scores and high scores are getting bigger and bigger. The enrollment score is naturally rising gradually, and the quality of students is also rising gradually, and then the enrollment rate is also increasing. This is a route for the rise of schools.

As a candidate who has experienced the balanced mode, the top-level exam-oriented education mode in the balanced mode is the most suitable mode in the domestic examination environment. The sea tactics, inspirational education and school spirit have been passed down from generation to generation, which has made countless poor students and ordinary students change their lives with the platform of college entrance examination. The advantages of this model are obvious. It adapts to the current methods and standards for selecting talents in the college entrance examination, can maximize the potential of children, and make maximum use of time to send you to a good university. However, the disadvantages are still obvious, because we pay one-sided attention to the cultivation of exam-oriented education, so we don't pay attention to other aspects, such as being a person, dealing with people, especially communication skills. Moreover, because of the maximization of efficiency, the friendship between students is mostly weak, and there is no feeling that students are like a big family in the ordinary mode.

Junior high school has experienced quality education and has some views on this aspect. Quality-oriented education was put forward many years ago, which is called all-round development of morality, intelligence, physique, beauty and labor, but its ideal is full. The reality is that this model does not adapt to the current performance-based model in China, and it has not produced outstanding results. The evaluation standard of quality education should not only be achievement. Quality education doesn't spend so much time on improving grades as exam-oriented education, and naturally there is no result of exam-oriented education. But are there clear evaluation criteria for other aspects? No matter how good quality education is, there is no standard for people to see your achievements, which is helpless in the big environment.