Your problem, fat woman, is that Miti is wrong, but Miti combines leniency with severity. The combination of leniency and strictness in higher education is to lower the current entrance threshold, let more people enter the university, and let them choose again in the process of studying.

Its corresponding mode is "strict entry and wide exit", which is the mode we are adopting now. People who enter the university are strictly selected. Of course, fewer people study in the university, and almost 100% can graduate.

Here is a question of how to look at human development. Now, it is up to the government to let people go to college, if they think they can. You should grasp the viewpoint of "completely ignoring the law of people's own development and not respecting the law of education": if people respect the law of education rather than the law of administration, they should be fully developed at their respective stages of development. Therefore, in this sense, "lenient entry and strict exit" respects people's development, because some people develop rapidly, while others develop rapidly; Some people develop in this period, while others develop in another period. "Yan Jin's generosity ignores the differences, individuality and particularity of human development! Therefore, when we talk about "lenient entry and strict exit", we actually respect people's development and the law of education. From this point, we can analyze who respects the law more, "lenient entry and strict exit" or "strict entry and strict exit". The more you can win recognition! ! !