Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational institution - What about the biology department of Wuhan University?
What about the biology department of Wuhan University?
Please look at the following posts from Wuhan University Forum, which will definitely help you:

The biology department of Wuhan University has a long history, but it is not as good as everyone's legend. The undergraduate students in the Biology Department of Wuhan University are of high quality, and the undergraduate teaching quality is absolutely first-class. However, if there is a way out, graduate students will definitely be the first in the country. NIBS, SIBS and Institute of Biophysics are all undergraduate students in the biology department of whu. But from the perspective of going abroad, Tsinghua Peking University is much worse than Fudan University. Going abroad is at the same level as HKUST and Nantah.

Postgraduate education, that is, the level of scientific research, is much worse than that of Peking University Tsinghua, especially after Rao Yi came. There are also some gaps with Fudan, because Fudan has a strong medical background. However, personally, Fudan has not made any progress now. After the death of Mr. Tan, there was no biological academician in Fudan. Medical science in Wuhan University has developed rapidly, which is not much worse than Tongji Chinese University. Compared with HKUST, HKUST and Princeton are very similar, both famous for mathematics and physics, so the biology department is also famous for its research structure, which may be a little different from HKUST in publishing papers. I think China Agricultural University and Huazhong Agricultural University are very powerful, but they are agronomy majors, and many teachers who are interested in plants and crops can consider them. Nanjing University is invincible in physics and chemistry, but in biology, Wu Da is definitely better than Nanjing University. Nankai university, ms recently came to many turtles, the specific situation is unknown, but the biological strength is definitely not as good as Wuhan university. Sun Yat-sen University is strong in medicine, but not as good as Wu Da in biology. Zhejiang University, I don't know much about it, but the biological history is not long, not as good as Wu Da.

Therefore, personally, China graduate education ranking:

NIBS Knibbs

Institute of Neurology, Institute of Biophysics. . . (Of course, many research institutes of the Chinese Academy of Sciences are also very poor, and they may not learn well. )

Peking University

Tsinghua, Fudan

HKUST, Wu Da, China Agricultural University, Huazhong Agricultural University.

Nanjing University, Beijing Normal University, Nankai University, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhejiang University. . .

So, if you have the ability to go to Chinese Academy of Sciences, NIBS, Peking University, Tsinghua and Fudan University, then don't come to Wuhan University. Fudan is in decline, but its position is excellent. The following words can be considered in HKUST, Wuhan University, Agricultural University and Nantah. . . . . . . Middle choice. . . It won't have much impact. You know, Wu Da also has top laboratories, and NIBS also has general laboratories.

Discipline strength:

1. Virology is the strongest thing in Wuhan University. There's nothing to say about this. But virology is biased and very sensitive.

The State Key Laboratory of Virology is jointly established by Wuhan University and Virology, but the Institute of Virology is also an alumnus of Wuhan University. The State Key Laboratory of Virology has many laboratories, many of which have nothing to do with viruses. Everyone should look carefully.

Wu Jianguo/Athena Chu is definitely the strongest virus maker. Their laboratory is a large joint laboratory. Because Mr. Wu is the director of the State Key Laboratory and has many other important positions, he has little management. In other words, Athena Chu is responsible and Wu Jianguo is not. The strongest articles about viruses should come from them, but because of their special specialties, it is difficult to publish high-scoring articles. The best authoritative magazine is J vir, but it is quite good, and it is the best magazine in the field of virology.

Secondly, I think he is a good teacher, Guo Deyin. He came back from Helsinki with a good level and a European background. I think it's the vice president.

Secondly, I don't know Mr. Shaw very well. It seems that I have a cooperative relationship with Liu Fenyong of Berkeley and have half a joint laboratory. It would be nice to have a chance to communicate with Liu. Teacher Xiao made meritorious service in SARS.

Viruses are the four best teachers here. Others like Hu Yuanyang are engaged in insect viruses. They earn a lot of money, but they are not very good academically. I don't understand. . . . But the main teachers are the four of them.

I'm not a virus worker and I'm not from their lab, so I don't know much about it.

Microorganisms:

It is also recognized as a strong person. But I don't think there is anyone here at all. Perhaps microorganism itself is very low-level as a science, so the article is basically low-level. There is nothing to say, and scientific research is not very good. Just got back, a man named Gao Xiangdong is a yeast maker. So this is also the place where undergraduates line up to do scientific research, because the materials are simple, the speed is fast and it is easy to produce results.

If you don't want to study for a master's degree and do engineering, then don't come here to study for a doctorate. Personally, I think there is no future.

"Department of Cell and Development", on the surface, says so, but most of the teachers in it are plants. Therefore, it is still the key laboratory of the Ministry of Education, and it is very difficult to declare the "State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Development".

It is also recognized as a strong place. Because of the existence of Academician Yang, it has been circulated for half a century. Basically, all teachers, such as Xia, Sun, Sun, Lu, etc., are children of Academician Yang, and many others are overseas. However, there was no successor. In this respect, Huanong is much better than HKUST, although Wu Da is much more famous. Because Huanong has Zhang Qifa.

Personally, the strongest is Sun, the chief of 973. He is a talented person with good scientific research, thinking and good personality. Everyone listens to his class with this idea.

Yanwu should be the strongest background, from a world-class top laboratory like Cai's in Nanhai. But I just came to Wuhan University, and I don't know how to do scientific research in the future.

Teacher Xia is busy with administration and scientific research.

In this respect, Academician Yang and his students are world-class, but I think there are not many good achievements, and they should be done much better than good ones.

Department of biochemistry and molecular biology

There are not many teachers, and they are not as famous as the traditional strengths of virology, but there are several good teachers, at least excellent laboratories in the Institute of Life Sciences of Wuhan University. The score should increase year by year.

Miss Guo Lin. What about those awesome and powerful people? If you search her related information, you can see many things she has done since she came to Wuhan University. She is the head of 973, with a lot of money and strong overseas relations. After all, she has been in America for so many years. But this is still much worse than Shu, because she worked in a company when she was in America.

As she works in a company, she prefers the technology of protein's histology. However, protein omics is undoubtedly something with great potential, and it is very hot now. I just feel that her current laboratory has not been fully developed, so there is no scientific achievement, or there is no good paper to show the application of mass spectrometry in biological science research. In addition, her direction is biased, and it is a very special laboratory. If you are really interested in protein's omics, biochemistry and other large-scale omics (not molecular biology, she should seldom do molecules), then you can consider her. She is a very capable person, with everyone's demeanor, leadership style, good personality and foreign flavor.

Miss Yoko. Not as strong as a professor (Guo stayed in the United States for N years after all), but she is a young backbone, hardworking and strong. She came back early. She worked hard step by step at Wu Da University and achieved success. Her RNA team has published many mainstream articles, such as NAR and RNA, which are quite good. The laboratory is also quite mature. There is also a lot of money because noncoding RNA is popular now. The laboratory is very big, and the disadvantage is naturally that there are too many people talking. Professor Zhang Yi is a very human person, quite kind but at the same time very rigorous and scientific. If you want to muddle along, don't go to her. She also has a very special spiritual pursuit. Great professor, personally optimistic.

Miss Liang Yi. The scientific research results should also be very good, similar to those in Zhang Yi. You can publish articles stably at JBC level and do protein structure, which requires high physical and chemical requirements. He and NIH work well together. It's just that I personally feel that the conditions of Wuhan University are too poor, and there are no advanced things such as nuclear magnetic resonance in Wuhan University.

Teacher Zou is an old professor. I don't know exactly. Ms is a doctor of traditional Chinese medicine. He is still a good teacher, but after all, he is old and will retire.

That's all I know. In a word, except Shu, everyone else is not a super cow, which means it is difficult for others to publish articles in magazines above 10. At present, Wu Da is expecting PNAS and G &;; D, even the emergence of CNS.

If the requirements are not very high, they are people who don't want to publish super articles. I think virology, plant development and biochemical molecules are very strong, and microorganisms have a great reputation, but the whole microbial industry is not very good.