Rejecting drugs, education is more important than punishment, which can make people really refuse drugs consciously and make drugs disappear from our lives. Education is definitely more important than punishment, but be careful not to deny punishment. If everyone has a good education, good reason and self-control since childhood, will he still be exposed to drugs? Punishment is only a compulsory means to make people dissatisfied, and it is only verbal, while education is to educate them fundamentally and ideologically. In Malaysia, drug trafficking is already the death penalty, but drug activities are not necessarily decreasing. Of course, punishment has its certain importance, but human weaknesses, such as greed and ignorance, still need to be eradicated by education. Refuse drugs, first, don't "unite" people who have nothing to do with drugs, second (not first), let people who have something to do with drugs "quit" refusing drugs, educate a wider range of people, and punish "key targets" and "key education" Those who have never been in prison don't know the pain. Under the existing system, to some extent, they also use "punishment" to force "education". We should see the nature of their changes. Education should begin with children. When they are young, they can use education. When they are old, they commit crimes. Re-education is ineffective. Drug trafficking is just education, so the crime rate has not decreased, but criminals are more rampant ... Second, education is universal and punishment is limited. Rejecting drugs, punishing drugs is more important than education. First, we must make sure that they must coexist. Secondly, the purpose is to reduce drug resistance. The method of education is to prevent problems before they happen, but to be rational. The method of punishment is to make others afraid, and then it is more effective to emphasize according to their own advantages and disadvantages. . . . The latter should be easy to say: education is more important than punishment: education is for drug addicts, and I fundamentally understand the essence of drugs. It is a radical method to actively refuse drugs and prevent them from taking drugs again. Punishment is more important than education. As long as it can achieve the goal of keeping drug addicts away from drugs forever, it is a radical method, which can be more directly quantified than educational punishment, so that drug addicts can learn from the pain of punishment and get quick results. My concern is punishment. If it can work more directly and effectively, if fighting is more important, since you punish it in one way, you should try to expand the scope of punishment, both psychological punishment and physical punishment ... Personally, it is fundamental to link punishment with criminal law, increase the crime cost of drug dealers and drug makers, and eliminate drugs from the source. Then you can analyze it from the characteristics of drugs. Drugs are a great test of a person's willpower, and ordinary people can't refuse him. You can't achieve a radical cure through education ... in fact, in addition to punishment, there is also the government's governance of the social environment. You can directly grasp the whole chain of drug refusal, including drug making, drug trafficking and drug abuse. More effective ~ ~