Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational institution - Criticism of exam-oriented education. The more vicious, the sharper the better.
Criticism of exam-oriented education. The more vicious, the sharper the better.
When the drawer was full of test papers and the books on the desk were piled up like a city wall, I realized that the special day of the third day was coming.

Every day when I ride home, I think, what am I doing? To be honest, I don't think I have learned what I want to have in junior high school these three years, and I think it is useful for my future. All right! English is one, chemistry is barely, but what have I learned from mathematics that is useful to me? My future career will not have quadratic function, nor will I use similarity and trigonometric function to find the height of buildings and the width of rivers. So what have I learned from these three years of mathematics? I learned the series-parallel circuit in physics, which is helpful, but what about the mechanical efficiency? What about buoyancy? What about stress? These messy things are said to be of no help to me, so why should I study them? Scores, right or something? I really don't understand. I like biology. Study! Never mind, even if it doesn't help. Learn history! I like it! Geography, learn it! It's good to know, but why take the exam? Why do things that are not commonly used in mathematics account for such a large proportion in the test paper?

I have to face100000 teachers and parents every day. Why am I tired and even disgusted? "Why aren't you as strong as XX?" "Why did you get such a small score?" "Why do you ..." We are a poor generation. At home, the teacher severely criticized the feudal imperial examination system. So, who will criticize the current education? Teachers always like to divide people into 3, 6 and 9 equal parts, and think that some students "can't carve a rotten wood ~!" However, how could he know that everyone is a loser? "Since God has given talents, let them find jobs!"! ! "It's just that he can't carve, so he said," You can't carve rotten wood! " I also know that even Confucius at 100 can't change this situation.

I agree with the statement that adolescence is the best time to learn knowledge, but the human brain is limited. Why is it weak? My weakness is that I cannot teach students in accordance with their aptitude. I like Chinese. If possible, I want to be an editor, but I still have to learn math badly. It can be said that for my ideal, I have to do something I don't like to do, so my grades can't go up. That means that many colleges and universities say goodbye to you, which means that your ideal is over.

In fact, the exam is not bad. As long as you can choose the subjects you like or dislike, you can write different papers and choose what you want to do, just like the physical education in the senior high school entrance examination, but the total score is 10. In that case, all my favorite papers are ancient Chinese, and they will appear, hehe.

In Xanadu, Gu Taoyuan said that the traffic was so bad that men and women dressed like strangers with yellow hair and enjoyed themselves. The Book of Rites, A Trip to Li Yun Avenue, also said that "A trip to the Avenue is also a trip to the world, and the world is public, so we should choose sages and make friends, so we should not only kiss, but also make friends." Young people, young people, young people "fully shows the ancient people's yearning for a better world in the future, so for me, I also hope that" in a few years. "