It is reported that a tuition bill published online recently is staggering. The mother who paid the bill lamented that it was not a child, but a money breaker. Experts say that burning money education will bring terrible consequences and should be stopped in time.

Experts say that the worse consequence of burning money education is that it artificially breaks the starting point fairness pursued by basic education, especially for rural children, students from the bottom families and disadvantaged schools. Under this rule, the biggest beneficiaries are all kinds of training institutions. However, are these training institutions carrying out real quality education? I'm afraid I just moved the exam-oriented education from the school to the training institution.

The education department called for reducing the burden. For parents and students, there are three choices: if everyone reduces the burden, everyone stands on the same starting line, and others reduce the burden and increase the burden, you will gain a comparative advantage; Others increase your burden and reduce your burden, and you are in a weak position. Is it possible for parents to choose cooperation after weighing the pros and cons? Impossible, can only take the initiative to increase the burden on each other.

Some education experts said that it is not against all social training courses, but that social training education should perform its duties with school education and family education to make up for the shortage of personalized education, rather than ending school courses ahead of schedule. Only in this way can the harm caused by burning money education be reduced.