Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational institution - The Family Education Promotion Law was officially implemented.
The Family Education Promotion Law was officially implemented.
The Family Education Promotion Law was officially implemented.

The Family Education Promotion Law was officially implemented. The main significance of the Family Education Promotion Law is to standardize parents' correct child-rearing behavior and create a good atmosphere for promoting the healthy growth of minors in the whole society. The Family Education Promotion Law was officially implemented.

The Family Education Promotion Law was officially implemented 1. The Family Education Promotion Law has been officially implemented since 2022 1.

It is clear that when parents or other guardians of minors undertake the responsibility of family education, they should not only fulfill their obligations of family education, but also correctly perform their obligations, take care of their children according to law and follow the correct educational rules.

On New Year's Day, a court issued a "family education instruction order" to "Xiong's parents".

Ordering to receive family education instructions has three meanings:

First, the recipient must accept it;

Secondly, the recipient must go to the guidance service institution to receive family education guidance;

Finally, the recipient also needs to follow the guidance of family education to do a good job in the aftermath.

Under the new situation, there are new requirements for parents. In 2022, please listen to the heart of a 10-year-old teacher to make better progress in children's education!

No matter how good the education is.

It's no use meeting uncooperative parents.

There is a saying in the San Zi Jing: It's your father's fault that you don't teach; What is a teacher? A strict missionary.

It can be seen that the ancients have long recognized that school and family education are integrated, and it is difficult for either party to speak.

As teammates, parents and teachers need trust and cooperation to walk side by side on the road of children's growth.

Parents support teachers and do not protect their weaknesses, so education is powerful; Teachers strictly control students and don't tolerate them, so children have a future!

Parents must realize the fact that no matter how good a teacher is, it is impossible to satisfy all parents.

If parents don't cooperate with teachers' work, even the best teachers' education for their children is ineffective.

1, understand the teacher.

Parents expect their children to be excellent, so do teachers? A teacher is a person who is not related to the child by blood, but is willing to give everything for the child and sincerely hopes that the child will be good. We have a responsibility to help children solve problems, not to argue for them.

2. Communicate with teachers more.

Communicating with teachers in time when problems are found is more conducive to educating children. It's best to make an appointment with the teacher in advance and talk about the children more deeply. Parents and teachers trust each other and cooperate with each other, which often leads to unexpected results.

3. The requirements for children should be unified.

School education and family education must be unified. How children learn at school should be learned at home. Only by persisting in this way can we form good habits.

If education is a big tree, the love and education of parents is the foundation, and the education of schools and teachers is the branch, only the cooperation of both sides can produce pleasing flowers.

Every progress of children has the support of parents and teachers, and the joint efforts of home and school can achieve a good education for children.

According to the news of Tianxin District People's Court 65438+1October 6, a few days ago, the Tianxin District People's Court of Changsha City, Hunan Province tried a dispute over the change of custody rights and issued the first family education order in China after the entry into force of the Family Education Promotion Law.

On October 27th, 2002110, the People's Court of Tianxin District of Changsha accepted the dispute between plaintiff Hu and defendant about changing custody, and plaintiff Hu requested the court to order the custody of married daughter Hu to be changed to plaintiff Hu.

The juvenile court of Tianxin District People's Court in Changsha found that on August 10, 2020, the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to divorce, and both parties agreed that their daughter Hu Mouqian would be raised by the defendant. Defendant Chen Mou remarried after divorce and moved to a new rental house with Hu Mouqian, which prevented Hu Mouqian from going to school for two weeks. After the plaintiff knew about it, she fulfilled her obligation to support and take care of her child Hu Mouqian by finding a full-time nursery and hiring a nanny.

Hu Mouqian has been living with the nanny since February, 20021year. As the mother of Hu Mouqian, the defendant only went to pick up the children on weekends after the plaintiff entrusted her with full-time care. The defendant did not actively fulfill his due guardianship obligations, so it can be concluded that the defendant was lazy in fulfilling his guardianship obligations and undertaking guardianship duties. Although the plaintiff fulfilled the obligation of raising and caring for the child Hu Mouqian by looking for full-time care and hiring a nanny, the plaintiff let the child Hu Mouqian live alone with the nanny, indicating that the plaintiff Hu Mouqian only fulfilled the obligation of "raising" and neglected to exercise the obligation of "raising", that is, education and protection.

In view of the fact that both the original defendant and the defendant neglected Hu Mouqian's physical, psychological and emotional needs, Hu Mouqian expressed his subjective will to live with his mother, the defendant in this case. At the same time, considering the defendant's subjective will to transfer Hu Mouqian to another school for care, and in combination with the agreement in the divorce agreement between the original defendant and the defendant that Hu Mouqian should be raised by the defendant, Tianxin District Court held that Hu Mouqian should be given again.

Accordingly, Tianxin District Court rejected the plaintiff Hu's claim in accordance with the law and sentenced the defendant to continue to perform the guardianship responsibility. However, the legal guardian Chen Mou's dereliction of duty was corrected according to law. According to the Law on the Protection of Minors and the Law on the Promotion of Family Education, the Tianxin District Court of Changsha issued a family education order to Chen Mou, the guardian of dereliction of duty.

The Family Education Order stipulates that Chen Mou should pay more attention to Hu Mouqian's physical, psychological and emotional needs. The specific way is to contact and communicate with the school teachers, and keep in touch with the teachers at least once a week to understand the details of Hu Mouqian; The judgment lived with Hu Mouqian, earnestly performed his guardianship duties and assumed the main responsibility of family education. The specific practice is that Hu Mouqian should not live alone with the nanny, but should live together with Hu Mouqian, and be raised and accompanied by himself or his close relatives; It also stipulates that the family education order is valid for one year. Before the expiration of the ruling, Hu Mouqian himself or a unit closely related to Hu Mouqian may apply to the people's court for revocation, change or extension of the family education order according to the actual situation; If the obligor Chen Mou violates the ruling, he shall be reprimanded, fined and detained according to the seriousness of the case; If a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility shall be investigated according to law.

Zhou Dan, Party Secretary and President of Tianxin District Court, said after the trial that the family education order was a concrete innovative measure made according to the Family Education Promotion Law, and it was officially implemented on June 5438+ 10/day. Its main significance lies in standardizing parents' correct child-rearing behavior and creating a good atmosphere for promoting the healthy growth of minors in the whole society. At the same time, the Tianxin District Court will establish a linkage mechanism with the Women's Federation, the Communist Youth League, civil affairs and other departments to ensure that parents have enough time to accompany their children, give them care, let their children receive the education they deserve, and promote the implementation of the Family Education Promotion Law.

The Family Education Promotion Law was officially implemented. 3 "Thank you, Judge. I will definitely correct my mistakes in the future, make up for the lack of care for my children, and let them grow up healthily." On June 6, 2022, 65438, the People's Court of Tianxin District, Changsha City, Hunan Province tried a dispute over the change of custody. In view of the guardian's dereliction of duty, the hospital issued the first domestic family education order after the People's Republic of China (PRC) Family Education Promotion Law came into effect.

It is the parents of Xiaoyun (a pseudonym), an eight-year-old child, who received the family education order. The two agreed to divorce in August 2020. It was agreed that the child should be raised by his mother, Chen Mou. Subsequently, Chen Mou remarried and took Xiaoyun to a new rental house, which made Xiaoyun unable to go to school for two weeks. Xiaoyun's father Hu found a full-time nursery and nanny to take care of the children. Xiaoyun has been living with the nanny since February 20021year, and her mother Chen only picks up the children on weekends. Father Hu thought that his ex-wife had not taken good care of the children and sued the court for changing custody.

After trial by the court, Chen Mou, the mother, did not actively perform her due guardianship obligations, and it can be concluded that the defendant was lazy in performing her guardianship obligations and assumed guardianship duties; Although the plaintiff's father, Hu, fulfilled his obligation to support and take care of Xiaoyun by looking for a full-time nursery and hiring a nanny, he let Xiaoyun live alone with the nanny and live in a country villa not far from Xiaoyun, indicating that his father, Hu, only fulfilled his obligation of "supporting" and neglected to exercise his obligation of "education" that is, protection.

In view of the fact that both the defendant and the defendant are lazy in fulfilling their obligations of support and guardianship, and both ignore Xiaoyun's physical, psychological and emotional needs, Xiaoyun expressed his willingness to live with his mother. At the same time, mother Chen Mou expressed her subjective will to transfer Xiaoyun to another school to take care of her. Based on the agreement in the divorce agreement between the original defendant and the defendant that Xiaoyun was raised by the defendant, Tianxin District People's Court rejected the plaintiff Hu's claim according to law and sentenced the defendant to continue to perform the guardianship responsibility. However, the legal guardian Chen Mou's dereliction of duty was corrected according to law. According to the Law on the Protection of Minors and the Law on the Promotion of Family Education, the Tianxin District People's Court of Changsha issued a family education order to Chen Mou, the guardian of dereliction of duty.

The Family Education Order stipulates that Chen Mou should pay more attention to Xiaoyun's physical, psychological and emotional needs. The specific way is to contact and communicate with school teachers more, and keep in touch with teachers at least once a week to learn more; Chen Mou was sentenced to live with Xiaoyun, and Xiaoyun was not allowed to live alone with the nanny. Xiaoyun was raised and accompanied by himself or his close relatives. It also stipulates that the family education order is valid for one year. Before the expiration of the ruling, Xiaoyun himself or a unit closely related to Xiaoyun may apply to the people's court for revocation, change or extension of the family education order according to the actual situation. If the obligor Chen Mou violates the ruling, he shall be reprimanded, fined and detained according to the seriousness of the case; If a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility shall be investigated according to law.

The family education order issued this time is the first family education order in China after the Family Education Promotion Law came into effect on June 65438+1 October1.

"Parents should learn to bring their babies according to law from now on. They can't just give money or a bite to eat. They must fulfill their responsibilities of care and love." Zhong Yuxi, director of the Juvenile Court Office of the Research Office of Hunan Higher People's Court, said. This case has made practical exploration for the strict implementation of the Family Education Promotion Law in China, which will have effective guidance and influence on the family education work in the whole province and even the whole country.