I want to say that the key to the success of children's stocking is to receive the best training for a long time. Stocking and cultivation are two sides of a silver coin. For example, instead of going to English classes on weekends, I will accompany my children to visit art galleries. This looks like grazing, but it is still raised.
According to the viewpoint of stocking, adults should let children develop their own interests. However, children cultivate an interest, whether it is reading or playing tennis. These interests themselves must be the result of training. Some parents say that our children are naturally fond of reading and don't need to be urged by adults. Then, children's interest in reading must be influenced by the family environment. The edification itself is an invisible accomplishment.
Furthermore, according to the viewpoint of stocking, adults should let their children arrange their own study. This is more difficult. Children who can arrange their own study are all half geniuses. Children's conscious learning must go through long-term training. For the vast majority of children, it is really impossible to learn without grasping. Last weekend, I heard a fourth-grade parent complain: I haven't paid much attention to my children since school started. I wanted to expect them to be conscious, but as a result, their studies have regressed a lot.
Therefore, the understanding of stocking education should not be too idealistic. The idealistic educational concept is unsustainable in reality. In fact, the value of stocking education lies in reminding parents not to be too impatient and not to toss. Let me give you an example. Several times, I saw the parents of kindergarten children say: I play English audio for children while they are playing with toys. Although children don't understand, English often rings in their ears, which is good for their listening.