Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational institution - Is it serious for China Agricultural University to brush people in the second interview?
Is it serious for China Agricultural University to brush people in the second interview?
The second interview of China Agricultural University is not serious. China Agricultural University (China Agricultural University for short) is located in Beijing. It is a national key university directly under the Ministry of Education of People's Republic of China (PRC), which was jointly built by the Ministry of Water Resources of People's Republic of China (PRC), the former Ministry of Agriculture of People's Republic of China (PRC) and Beijing.

China Agricultural University covers an area of 6,543,800 square meters. At the end of 2065.438+09, the school occupied an area of 6.5438+0.20 million square meters. 19 college, with 66 undergraduate majors; Full-time undergraduate students 12 182, full-time graduate students 8930; 1860 full-time teachers; There are 2 1 authorized points for doctoral degrees in first-level disciplines and 32 authorized points for master's degrees in first-level disciplines; There are nearly 2 million books in the library.

The postgraduate entrance examination of China Agricultural University adopts the difference re-examination. Many times, high scores are brushed and low scores are reversed. The key to the second interview is the second interview. The interviewer should judge the students' scientific research ability and potential within 20-30 minutes. If you can't give full play to your advantages in such a short time, you will lose the chance of a second interview.

Tutors of China Agricultural University pay attention to students' scientific research potential during the second interview, that is, solid theoretical foundation, scientific research professional quality and scientific research potential. The display of theoretical basis is not only the report card of undergraduates, but also the achievement and major innovation of undergraduate scientific research projects. Scientific research literacy and potential are usually reflected by students' descriptions of design experiments or scientific research projects. In the review process, when we discuss these questions, we should try our best to reflect these views in our own answers.

In the re-examination of China Agricultural University, we need to learn to guide the tutor's questions to our own fields and show our advantages. If the whole second interview can't take the initiative to ask questions from the tutor, the result can be imagined.

The selection of graduate students in China Agricultural University is relatively fair. Tutors need capable people to do this project, so tutors will choose students who think they have scientific research literacy and potential to join their team. The better the school, the more obvious this is.