June 7, the day of the college entrance examination. This morning, Yao Jiaxin was executed in Xi, Shaanxi. The Supreme People's Court believes that the defendant Yao Jiaxin killed Zhang Miao with a knife after driving down the victim, and his behavior has constituted the crime of intentional homicide. Its criminal motive is extremely despicable, its means are particularly cruel, its circumstances are particularly bad, and its consequences are particularly serious. It is a very serious crime. (Today's edition of A 18)

When 9.33 million students entered the college entrance examination, 22-year-old college student Yao Jiaxin came to an end. Whether intentionally or coincidentally, on this special day, putting a college student who has committed a felony to death will always make people have infinite associations. Perhaps, this is a life education lesson for senior three students who have just grown up or are about to grow up; Perhaps, this is another "binge drinking" for those students who are about to enter the university hall. Its warning significance obviously goes far beyond the execution of Yao Jiaxin.

Yao Jiaxin was sentenced to death according to law, which is undoubtedly a victory of the law. Looking back on the disputes and twists and turns in the trial and judgment of drug cases in recent months, it should be said that it is not easy to have this achievement, which embodies the conscience, hard work and wisdom of countless legal guards.

Then, this is not something that deserves anyone's happiness. Two young lives died because of a minor traffic accident, and both families have to bear the pain of losing their loved ones. From last year1October 20 10 to June 7 this year, Yao Jiaxin's case seems to be no longer Yao Jiaxin's case, from driving and killing a peasant woman and stabbing her eight times to shut her up, to being detained, the first instance and the second instance, to the execution of the death penalty review. In the face of the bizarre noise of murder, Lao Yu, a columnist of the Financial Times, said: "The public is afraid that this society will really be dominated by the law of the jungle, and the weak will completely lose the protection of the law."

Yao Jiaxin was finally executed, which was a victory of the rule of law, but a failure of education. Yao Jiaxin came to this step, and her parents are hard to blame. It is the father's fault that his son doesn't teach. 2 1 year-old college students have their own cars. Covetous of material comforts, psychologically gloomy, not only afraid of being embarrassed by the "poor", but also carrying a knife privately. All these factors have made Yao Jiaxin's big mistake. Not to mention his parents' many behaviors afterwards, its essence is to push Yao Jiaxin into the abyss step by step. Secondly, there are defects in university education. If the defense lawyer's words are true and Yao Jiaxin is a good student with "spotless growth path, excellent study and various awards", then we can only say that such university education is a failure. Can you still be called a "good student" if you don't know how to respect life and strict laws and lose your basic personality and humanity? In fact, the so-called "elite education", which only teaches without educating people, has aroused strong doubts from people of insight in society, but it has rarely changed under the inertia of the system.

Our society also has a responsibility. Yao Jiaxin's loneliness, selfishness and cruelty, his "poverty-weariness" mentality and distorted values all reflect various bizarre phenomena in society. The misleading of parents' money supremacy, the lack of school moral education, the decline of social atmosphere and Yao Jiaxin's own defects, when a car accident happened and he had to bear the responsibility, his sudden outbreak was enough to destroy everything. Indeed, the pain left by Yao Jiaxin's case to family education, school education and social education deserves more time to review.

As Professor An said, "Yao Jiaxin case is no longer a separate case, but a social event". According to the professors' thinking, if Yao Jiaxin is kept alive by law, it will fully reflect "the peace and generosity of our society and the kindness and tolerance of our nation". This prospect is really fascinating. The problem is that if Yao Jiaxin does not die, not only will the death penalty system stipulated by law lose its meaning of existence, but the bottom line of social conscience will also be broken at will, so millions of Yao Jiaxin will emerge one after another. It is not the proper meaning of the law to "save" a Yao Jiaxin and make thousands of Yao Jiaxin and innocent people pay a heavy price.

Yao Jiaxin left. If the disappearance of a young life can bring some changes to the world and reduce or disappear indifference and cruelty, then this case is enough to go down in history.