When I was in college, I thought I was telling stories to my classmates seriously and clearly. As a result, my classmates always couldn't understand what I said. It turned out that what I said was disorganized, logically chaotic, and there was no logical jump, even a little incoherent. This is a typical sporadic thinking.
When I was a graduate student, I often listened to other people's speeches. I feel very clear that they always speak in the way of point one, point two and point three. This is a typical listing thinking.
List thinking is to list all kinds of points according to the same level or dimension, but there is no obvious logical relationship between points and it is not systematic, so list thinking is a latitude thinking, and 9% people in the world are list thinking. Therefore, it is good for a person to have the thinking of listing.
We often hear that there are standard thinking, horizontal thinking, vertical thinking and so on. These thoughts are actually an extension of the listing thinking.
Systematic thinking is a structured way of thinking from the perspective of the whole and the whole process. The so-called whole includes all parts, such as the whole product including the industrial chain, various professional departments, members of the whole project and so on. The whole process is the whole process of creating and delivering products, the whole life cycle of product use and a virtuous circle, which is independent, logical and cyclical.
Systematic thinking is multidimensional, that is, it is often said that large systems overcome small systems. If you want to think systematically, you must have a complete knowledge system, and only 0.9% people in the world have systematic thinking. With systematic thinking, you are already a great talent.
Some common methods of systematic thinking include collective efforts, six thinking hats, 360 survey, fishbone diagram, BSC (Balanced Scorecard) and so on. These methods are concrete manifestations of systematic thinking.
Enterprise managers must first master systematic thinking. When solving problems or daily work, managers should think from the perspective of the company's overall business and whole process, which must be the basic requirement of managers.
"As a manager, you should be one level higher than others in quality, not one level higher in position."
First of all, please answer a question: What factors determine people's life span?
Some people think it is the natural environment, some people think it is the guarantee of life, some people think it is economic conditions, some people think it is social security, genetic factors, eating habits, nutritional supplements, physical exercise, emotional mentality, medical level, culture and education, etc.
Elizabeth, winner of the Nobel Prize in Biology in 2009, once said that people should live to the age of 100, with a reasonable diet accounting for 25%, others accounting for 25% and mentality accounting for 50%.
According to this statement, mentality is the most important factor that determines a person's life span. Is that really the case?
What determines a person's life span? It's actually human genes. Once a fertilized egg is formed, it has already decided a person's life span. Gene is the decisive factor, and no one can exceed the specified life span of gene coding, so other factors are only slightly away from the coding life span. From the gene is the decisive causal logic, from the source to think, that is, the source thinking.
Ecology is the ecology of the whole industrial chain, including customers' corporate channels, supply chains, partners' interests and value beliefs, the whole industrial chain environment, global market scope, customers' all-round needs, complete solutions, the whole process of product delivery, the whole process of product development, the whole process of product use and so on.
All-round ecological thinking includes overall view, overall view, original view, long-term view and ecological view. Only 0.009% people in the world have ecological thinking.
In my book The Power of Value Belief, I put forward a theoretical system-"Value Belief Theory". Value belief theory can not only open up the internal logic of all management theories in the world, but also open up the logical channel between theory and the outside.
Only by clarifying the logical relationship of enterprise management theories and making all management theories "live" can we really play the due value of management theories. Now there is no hope for the development of many enterprises because the methodology adopted is "dead", and I don't know where the problem lies and what the logic behind it is.
Einstein once said: it is impossible to solve problems at the level where they arise, and problems must be solved at a higher level.
Solving the problem of the lower elements of value belief depends on the upper elements of value belief. For example, the problem of value resource cost at the phenomenon level should be solved from the perspective of value behavior; Solve the problem of value behavior with values; The problem of values should be solved from the perspective of values, so as to completely solve the problem.