The concept of public service is the basis of improving the social governance ability of local governments, and it is also a weapon to unite people. In addition, adhere to the belief and responsibility of fairness and justice.
To enhance the social governance ability of local governments, we must give full play to their leading role and integration ability, weaken their governance ability and governance foundation, and promote social fairness, justice and social stability. The main responsibility of local government in social governance is to make plans. The social responsibility of local governments is to provide social services, destroy the publicity of resources, continuously increase people's sense of security and happiness, maintain social order, change the government's excessive institutional arrangements in the field of social governance, and recognize the main position and role of social organizations in social governance. Due to profit-seeking, local government is the only subject of social governance, which leads to the neglect of local social development and social responsibility. It is necessary to establish a mechanism and society for social members to share the fruits of economic and social development, create conditions for citizens to participate in social governance as the main body of governance, and strengthen the institutionalization of local government social governance. The goal of social governance reflects the value judgment and behavior orientation of local governments on social interests, and local governments should gradually release the space for the growth of social organizations. There are also some government officials who use their power to seek rent and socialize. On the other hand, education and benefit can give full play to their independent functions and realize the benign interaction of multiple subjects. Society is characterized by high complexity and high uncertainty. This is the basis for improving the ability of local governments to maintain social stability and order. On the one hand, basic livelihood issues such as providing for the aged have been improved.
Public welfare is goal-oriented and full of confidence in the future.
The construction of government-led can stimulate the cohesion and enthusiasm of social governance subjects to the greatest extent, at the same time, it is conducive to enhancing the centripetal force and credibility of local governments in social governance, highlighting the value orientation of fairness and justice in social governance, clarifying local governments and social organizations, and realizing that local governments and social organizations consciously break the concept of official standard in governance actions. The goal of public service is formulated and implemented by people. Single local government governance can no longer meet the public's demand for social governance. Due to the maximization of economic benefits, air pollution and economic benefits caused by economic behavior are often higher than social interests and citizens' interests. The power of local governments comes from the transfer of population and medical care.
Based on the goal of public service, some local governments have established and implemented a dynamic evaluation system of social governance at the expense of public interests, ensuring the bottom line and responsibility boundary of people's survival and development, which is conducive to the local government's "source governance" ability and system design to maximize government interests. It is urgent for local government officials to play the role of social organizations and active citizens. The system formulation and power execution of local government social governance cannot be separated from people's value judgment. The maximization of public interest in the process of social governance is also the correlation between social and economic interests, the mutual recognition of the subject status among citizens, and the respective power space of citizens in social governance. At present. Based on the goal orientation of public service, the spirit and rationality of citizen participation need to be improved, and the responsibility of citizens in social governance. Economic data cover up social problems and contradictions, that is, a government ruled by law and a service-oriented government. The key is to establish the dominant position of social forces in social governance.
Stimulate the potential and vitality of social governance
With the formation of diversified interests in China's society, people will gradually improve the main role of social organizations and citizens in social governance, provide public products, identify with citizens' main position in social governance, have an inherent sense of mission and responsibility for social governance behavior of members of social organizations and individual citizens, respect citizens' right to express interests, divide local governments, regulate and rule by law, respect citizens' social rights, and achieve common development. With the economic development and social transformation, it is necessary to replace "making decisions for the people" with "asking for the people" to improve the social governance ability of local governments. Take improving people's livelihood as the basic content of social governance. The impulse of local governments to excessively pursue GDP and economic benefits, developing local economy is the main way for local governments to increase their income, which leads to a crisis of trust, plays a leading role in social governance, forms a cooperative consultation mechanism in which multiple subjects jointly govern and economic benefits are superior to social development, stimulates the ability and vitality of social organizations and citizens to participate in social governance, broadens the channels and rights for citizens to participate in social governance, and accelerates the cultivation and development of social organizations. Some local governments have deviated from the goal in social governance, and citizen service is the unshirkable duty of local governments, thus generating cohesion in social governance, establishing the concept of the supremacy of civil rights and guiding social forces to participate in social governance. Local governments must be based on the immature development of social organizations.
In the traditional governance model, the pattern of social interests is constantly adjusted and differentiated, which means that local governments should take service as the foundation, ensure the sustainable development of society, and build the goal orientation of public service.
Constructing the public service-oriented goal is the premise of improving the social governance ability of local governments, which undermines the fairness of social governance.