The side effects of job evaluation far outweigh the positive effects. Many people's professional titles and abilities are not proportional, and many people just use some crooked ways to get professional titles! Without evaluating their own position, those crooked magazines and academic institutions will have no living space! Others, such as continuing education and teacher training schools, have lost their current jurisdiction! But this is what grassroots teachers are happy to see and expect!
Teachers' titles in western countries are appointed by the school board or the school board itself according to the education and academic level of XX teachers. This university can hire you as a professor, and that university can hire you as an associate professor or visiting professor. It was the same in the Republic of China, and there was no professional title evaluation Committee to evaluate it. He once worked in the first-tier cities for five years as a member of the senior title evaluation Committee and deputy director of the district-level intermediate title evaluation Committee. I heard too many opinions, such as how many academic papers must be published in relevant journals at home and abroad besides teaching effect and moral cultivation. Qualified teachers are naturally happy. Those who don't meet the requirements will say that his publishing papers doesn't mean that his teaching effect is good, or that his papers are published in national first-class journals. Another example is the teaching effect. I often look at the results of the subjects he taught in the senior high school entrance examination and the college entrance examination. Teachers with low grades will say that the subject papers are difficult. A low score doesn't mean I can't teach, it should depend on my long-term effect. Therefore, it is not easy to evaluate those who are evaluated and those who are evaluated. Without evaluation, teachers' enthusiasm cannot be mobilized. Because China people are used to egalitarianism. Teachers switched to freelancing, found their own jobs and were hired by the school board or the school board. I like to hire you as a professor, associate professor, senior middle school teacher, intermediate teacher and senior middle school teacher. Whether you apply or not is up to you. Will it be all right? It is estimated that many teachers oppose it, and there is no such institution in domestic public schools. What do you suggest?
How do you know that Japanese education leads the world? What about the data? How can we judge that education in China is backward? Without any cultural confidence, this question is wrong.
They are generally not allowed to go to the podium. Ability must be the majority. Don't just look at incompetent data. Ability must be the subject.
Japanese teachers don't evaluate professional titles, and the reason why education leads the world is the student grading system. No matter how old you are, I'm afraid you are fifty or seventy years old, and your education level is only a few grades! In order to live, you must get an advanced degree, and then you must study hard!
Japan's world-leading education has little to do with the evaluation of professional titles. First of all, the quality of Japanese people is generally high. Japan popularized primary education 0/00 years ago, and now Japan has popularized university education. The general improvement of national quality is a solid foundation for the development of education. Secondly, the Japanese do things rigorously and meticulously, forming good behavior habits for children and forming a good atmosphere. In addition, children always adhere to the educational concept, do their own things well, and form a simple growth process. These are excellent educational resources.
The fundamental reason for the evaluation and appointment of professional titles of primary and secondary school teachers in China is the absolute shortage of financial supply. If the evaluation and appointment are excessive, there will be no money to pay salaries, and even some local senior teachers can only pay living expenses. Japan attaches importance to education as a basic national policy of building a country and rejuvenating the country. The salary of teachers is higher than that of civil servants, and the salary is increased according to the length of teaching. Teachers' entry is based on assessment, and intellectuals who can teach are selected as teachers. The assessment is realistic and there is no possibility of cheating. Once you find out who is not working hard or cheating, you will be asked to find a new job. Finding a new job in Japan means re-employment. Starting from the starting salary of 16w yen, you will get an increase of 0.1w yen every year. It's no problem to support yourself, but it's difficult to support the family. Because only one man works in Japan, a full-time wife of a woman has to take care of two children.
The so-called professional title in China's education system has nothing to do with the teaching level. Senior teachers are not good teachers at all, but masters who are good at forging information in order to participate in the evaluation. They are the red stars in front of school leaders and have no positive effect at all.
Because Japan has no primary and secondary school titles except universities, once it is hired, it is an iron rice bowl, regardless of its ability. The longer the working hours, the higher the salary. Because there is no pressure and Japanese teachers lack initiative, Japanese education circles are often criticized by the media. The problem of updating teachers' knowledge and declining the quality of education has been puzzling Japanese society. To this end, the Japanese government launched the in-service teacher training system in 2009, stipulating that all in-service teachers whose teacher certificates expire in 10 must receive more than 30 hours of courses related to their majors in relevant higher education institutions within two years before they can renew their teacher certificates. As for the teacher's moral character, it is even more difficult to say. According to the statistics of Japan's Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports and Sports, in 20 19, as many as 8,249 teachers were punished for various reasons, including 550 teachers who were punished for corporal punishment of students, 273 teachers who were suspected of indecency, and 5,478 teachers who were punished for mental illness. According to news reports, from 20 1 1 to 2020, a total of 55 teachers in five counties, including Hiroshima and Okayama, were punished on suspicion of indecency.