Especially for the students who take the small comprehensive test or the big comprehensive test, the usual foundation is the key to winning or losing.
I have suffered such losses myself.
Wei Xie, who teaches me history, is a very serious and good teacher.
His class seems to have a kind of magic, which can attract you tightly. The long river of history seems to be close to us at once under his explanation.
More importantly, he can always guide us to think about the relationship and essence behind them through complicated historical phenomena.
This is the most important way to learn history.
Under his guidance, I successfully studied history in my freshman year.
Maybe I was carried away by the victory. Senior two began to be lazy and no longer paid attention to mastering the basic knowledge in time.
I just memorized it temporarily before the exam.
I didn't realize how stupid I was until I reviewed in the third semester of senior three.
As the basic knowledge is solid, I can recall all the contents effortlessly.
And even if you read the text of Grade Two for several times, you may still forget it.
Only then did I know why the teacher always asked us to "focus on the foundation and peace".
The study of history in high school is completely different from that in junior high school, and rote learning can't solve the problem.
What high school history needs more is understanding.
It is best to review once a week and once a month.
When reviewing, the key is to read books repeatedly and improve in repetition.
Books are the most fundamental.
It is unrealistic to talk without books.
?
When reading the contents of each section, we should think about what happened before and after a historical event, whether there is any internal connection between them, and what historical truth can be explained.
Historical events can also be compared horizontally and vertically.
For example, what are the similarities and differences between two coups or two policies? Why are there such similarities and differences? What does it mean?
It is also very simple to analyze similarities and differences, which is nothing more than thinking from several fixed plates such as background, nature and influence.
Some books say that history should be studied in three dimensions.
I think the so-called "three-dimensional" is probably the connection between horizontal and vertical.
If we often think like this, we can analyze the essence of different historical phenomena more accurately and solve any problems we encounter.
This is a problem that should be paid attention to when reading.
Books are more than just reading. It's no use remembering some times, places and events. The most important thing is to learn to think and study with historical thinking and explore what is behind the incident.
I believe you will soon find that the more you read, the more interesting you will be.
?
Secondly, it is of course very important to do the questions.
The process of doing the problem is actually a process of review and reflection.
Nowadays, there are few historical questions that simply test knowledge itself.
This is usually a test of your analysis of an event.
This requires the use of the set of kung fu accumulated during reading, and there are also some skills.
For example, when doing multiple-choice questions, we often encounter some problems such as "root" and "essence", which are usually analyzed from the aspects of productivity determining production relations and economic base determining superstructure.
As long as there are options about these aspects, they are generally correct.
In my opinion, the questions of "direct" and "indirect" are actually very simple.
When you answer "direct", you can make your thinking simpler. You will be what you thought at first, and you don't have to turn any corners at all.
Everything except "direct" can be safely classified as "indirect".
? ...
The ancients said, "You can't learn." .
I think, the exam is nothing more than such a stage, an exam that doesn't need explanation and rationality. It exists to let you know where you are and where you want to go.
Therefore, I think we should keep a positive and optimistic attitude towards every exam.
When you succeed, you will feel gratified, and your efforts will eventually be rewarded; When you fail, you don't have to be depressed and regret. Regret always belongs to cowards.
At this time, you will get more and gain more. At this time, you will find those treasures that you ignored, but reported the value; At this time, it is undoubtedly the greatest gain for a person to become sober from ignorance.
I think, for a course like history, the test is our patience; What we pursue is our carefulness, but what is forbidden is our happiness; Being a man can't be duplicitous, which may be a lesson from history.
Learning emphasizes mouth-to-mouth, hand-to-hand and efficiency.
For history textbooks, it is the most precious wealth. Things follow the principle of "following the ancestors", that is, no matter how things change and develop, their core and essence will not change.
Therefore, I subjectively think that there is no deeper reason for the unsatisfactory exam results.
In the final analysis, it is because you don't understand the textbook thoroughly. Once the most fundamental and core content is not investigated clearly, how can we analyze and solve the problem?
I think it is very important for the content of the book, whether it is words or pictures, whether it is bold or italic. Maybe you don't realize it at this time, but one day, you will expose your weakness.
Therefore, don't try to cover up your own knowledge defects, because in any case, it will not succeed, all efforts are in vain, and all assumptions are in vain.
At the same time, a book is a wonderful cartoon, and you can never ignore the memory connection related to it. Once you read this book in isolation and mechanically, you are far less than a tape recorder.
Therefore, no matter what you do, you must understand the "ins and outs" of things and connect them, so that you will gain more.
Therefore, I think that learning history well lies in essence, not in abundance, and doing more topics is only to consolidate textbooks.
If we "put the cart before the horse" and think that textbooks are just tools for exams, it is a big mistake!
So I also think that sometimes, some people's learning methods are somewhat inappropriate. Although I admit that the world is big and people are different, I still carry forward my consistent style. I am also used to holding a history textbook all day and pondering every word carefully. In fact, this is a kind of enjoyment. Read more books and you will get a lot of enlightenment that you can't get in the exam.
Of course, I don't deny that exams are very important, but I insist that exams are a tool for us to understand the world of our ancestors.
Time will tell, and I firmly believe that I am right.
Cultivate interest in history, interest is the best teacher.
2. Keep in mind the historical events with two lines of time and space and two coordinates.
3. Read more books about history, historical stories, biographies and events.
4. If you want to learn the ancient history of China well, you must learn ancient Chinese and remember the usage of real words and function words, which is quite useful for studying the ancient history of China in the future.
5, usually read more books about history, it is best to run through a long time, covering a wide range of general history, which is conducive to the establishment of knowledge networks and interests.
6. It is very important to do exercises. Buy a set of papers and do multiple-choice questions. Repeat each question several times at regular intervals.
7. Short answer questions and essay questions generally need to be memorized according to key words.
First, divide a paragraph to be memorized into different types, such as "why", first divide each paragraph into "political reasons, economic reasons, social reasons, cultural reasons" and so on.