Giving teachers the autonomy to graduate from master's degree and doctor's degree gives tutors more power to some extent, which needs to be treated dialectically.
The tutor is the person who knows your scientific research ability and level best to a certain extent. If your ability can't reach the graduation level, the tutor does have the right to speak. This can improve the academic level of master students and doctoral students to a certain extent. But it also requires the tutor to have a good teacher's morality, a responsible attitude towards students and a proper grasp of students' abilities.
Of course, this will also lead to a more unequal relationship between teachers and students, and students are at a disadvantage, which may lead students to dare not refute the teacher's point of view at will, dare not put forward their own ideas, and even dare not call a spade a spade when complaining about the teacher. Rigid relationships may be detrimental to academic development.
Give tutors the right to make their own decisions, provided that students can complain about some improper behaviors of tutors. It is clear how tutors should use their own power, and establish relevant supporting mechanisms to supervise them, so as to prevent tutors from using their power to improperly squeeze students and turn them into dictators.
Tutors and students are two equal subjects of rights, so it is necessary to ensure that tutors can further stimulate students' research motivation on the premise of making good use of their rights; At the same time, it is necessary to ensure that students can appeal to their tutors for unfair treatment in academic research, and effectively protect their legitimate rights and interests from infringement.