Second, when dealing with students who often violate discipline, we must adhere to one principle: stick to the bottom line of education-let those students who often violate discipline understand what they can and can't do, and bear certain responsibilities and pay corresponding prices for it. Of course, while punishing students, it is more important not to forget that teachers should let them know that they are doing this for their own good. To treat these students who often violate discipline, we can unite all forces that can be United, including parents and teachers, and educate them. There is more than one student who gives everyone a headache in an ordinary class, which is beyond the wisdom of a teacher. At this time, we should make good use of all available conditions. In the process of education, our teachers should be good at protecting themselves. At present, some students commit crimes every three days. If you criticize him, you will tease him. You can't punish him for standing or running. Of course, you can't beat him. Otherwise, you can sue the school leaders, or the education commission, or the news media. As teachers, we may find it hard to bear the unfair burden. To treat such a student, we should give him a lesson in order to achieve remarkable educational results. Therefore, in this case, we can educate him with the help of parents, of course, this trick is not commonly used.
Third, for students who occasionally make mistakes or make mistakes for the first time and are proud of themselves, they should pay attention to choosing the right time when criticizing, and use the way of conversation with little educational tact and slight reminder. The head teacher should be tolerant of the students and believe that their mistakes are only caused by "temporary confusion". When speaking, he should hint, but he should not pierce this layer of "paper". This implicit dialogue often produces the effect that "more is told in silence than in voice".
Fourthly, for students who have a bad temper and have serious resistance to their teachers, we can adopt discussion-based criticism, which is a relatively mild criticism. Teachers should pay attention to their body language and conversation style, and be good at asking questions. For example, "What's wrong with you today?" "Tell me yourself first, what did you do wrong today?" "Do you know the essence of your behavior today?" Questions like this, with obvious emotional color and value orientation, often make students feel disgusted and more resistant. Can you tell me what's your trouble? "Can you tell me what you think of this matter today?" "I heard that you and so-and-so students have some misunderstandings. Can I help you communicate? " Equivalence sentences are neutral, leaving room for questions. From a positive perspective and problem-solving perspective, discussing with students not only shows respect for students, but also guides students to express their true thoughts and feelings, while avoiding unnecessary confrontation with students.
Fifth, for some students with rebellious personality, strong self-esteem and inferiority, we can adopt the method of praise and criticism. When we criticize a student's shortcomings, we might as well praise his several advantages first. Every student has his own advantages. As a teacher, we should be good at grasping the bright spot of each student. Although it may only be a small bright spot, it is very likely that you can dig out a big gold mine buried in his heart through this small bright spot. Makarenko, a famous educator in the former Soviet Union, once said, "Look at the advantages of students with a magnifying glass and their shortcomings with a reduced mirror." Mr. Liu, a famous writer in China, also said this classic sentence in one of his works: "An ugly criminal also has his own spiritual beauty!" No matter how naughty our students are, they won't be equated with criminals, will they? Only in this way can students be convinced of the teacher, accept criticism with an open mind and correct their shortcomings and mistakes in time.
Sixth, some students who are very defensive and unwilling to admit their mistakes easily can be criticized in time. Criticism should be timely, not afterwards. This kind of students often deny it afterwards after violating discipline, so they should criticize it in time and on the spot, just like what happened at that time, and break through the psychological defense of the criticized.
Seventh, students who are smart but want to show off should be criticized and educated in a static way, that is, they should not be led by the nose by students who violate discipline, and sometimes they will even be deliberately left out. In the process of educating students, teachers may encounter such two students who violate discipline, two in three days. You often talk to him, and he admits his mistakes. But today he made this mistake, changed it, and tomorrow he made another one, changed it, and the day after tomorrow there was a new one. In short, he often makes new things, and he especially likes to drill into the corner of the teacher. The more you tell him, the worse the effect will be. You ask him to write an examination, and he can write you a thousand words in half an hour. It seems that he really regrets and wants to repent. At this time, our teacher can deliberately ignore him. When he does one more thing, he writes it down directly in his notebook, deliberately letting him see that he has written it down, but he just doesn't criticize him or ignore him. He knows that the teacher has something in his hand and probably guessed what the teacher is going to do, and people will gradually become honest.
Hope to adopt, thank you.