A few days ago, the French government Council of Ministers passed? Defendable right of residence? The bill promises to increase investment in housing construction and basically realize housing for everyone in France. At the same time, the bill stipulates that the state guarantees the housing rights of legitimate residents, and five types of families with housing difficulties can ask the competent authorities to solve the housing problem. If the problem is not solved, they can bring a lawsuit to the administrative court. (This newspaper 65438+ 10 19 a 18 edition) As the French Minister of Employment, Social Solidarity and Housing said, has it been realized? Defendable right of residence? Is it a project? A goal of constitutional significance? . Our poet used it more than 1000 years ago? There are thousands of buildings in Ande, and all the poor people in the world are very happy. Such a poem expresses the same hope. Without food, education, medical care and house, people can't live. Therefore, it is called. Xinsanminsheng? what's up Housing, medical care, education? In fact, they all belong to the basic necessities of modern people and are a part of the right to life, that is, a part of basic human rights. Is that clear? Xinsanminsheng? , is it? A goal of constitutional significance? .

Now in France, the right to education and health protection, as well as the right to housing passed this time, are all? Defendable? . This means that people who can't afford to go to school can safeguard their right to education through legal means, those who look down on illness can safeguard their right to health through legal means, and those who have no housing can safeguard their right to housing through legal means. In other words, the French government has realized the protection of people's basic human rights by taking on more responsibilities by itself.

Of course, the differences in national conditions are expected to be completely solved in a short time through the power of the government? Xinsanminsheng? Is unrealistic. However, although the government's ability to take responsibility is different, the responsibility it shoulders is the same, and we must realize this. We all remember the resignation of two senior officials, Qiu and Cheongwadae, the Korean Minister of Construction and Transportation, because the real estate policy failed, resulting in high housing prices. What is the message to us, which France passed this time? Defendable right of residence? The bill is exactly the same, that is, the government is responsible for excessive housing prices, and the government has the obligation to realize the basic right of everyone to have a house to live in.

The problem now is that many of our government officials don't seem to realize this at all. On the contrary, what are they keen on? Run a city? Sell the land at a symbolic high price and get a gray profit from it. So that the rapid rise in housing prices is regarded as? Official results? Go and check. Xinhua News Agency has published many articles condemning them. Local governments are behind the rise in housing prices? . This shows that some government officials not only fail to realize? Home ownership? Is the natural responsibility of the government, but it is highly excited about the general rise in housing prices? Prosperity? , and take pains to maintain high housing prices by various means, while putting money in your pocket and wearing an official hat on your head in the midst of folk sufferings.

Curbing the excessive rise in housing prices has not been included in the performance appraisal. Officials have only interests in the face of rising housing prices and do not have to bear any responsibility. The official hat does not fall for the house price. This is the crux of the problem. Sense of responsibility, taking the greatest responsibility within one's own ability, and making it necessary to fulfill the responsibility with the power of the system. I think this is France? Defendable right of residence? Left us with the greatest enlightenment.