It is reported that in recent years, around the governance of off-campus "small dining tables", some places have closed off-campus "small dining tables". However, in the face of huge demand, shutting down "across the board" not only triggered social contradictions, but also allowed unqualified "small dining tables" to take advantage of "demand". What do you think of this?
From June 2065438 to June 2006, the former the State Council Food Safety Office and other six departments issued the Opinions on Further Strengthening Food Safety in and around School Campus, requiring local food and drug supervision departments to strengthen food safety supervision of family meals. On September 20 17, the former the State Council Food Safety Office and other departments 14 issued the Opinions on Improving the Quality and Safety Level of Catering Industry, requiring local food and drug supervision departments to strengthen the registration management of small tables and family meals. In the working points of 20 18 issued by China Food and Drug Administration, it is proposed to strengthen the standardized guidance of canteens and small dining tables in rural kindergartens in conjunction with relevant departments.
Intensive documents give confidence to the supervision of "small dining tables", and the list of qualified "small dining tables" published regularly in most areas also makes parents feel a little relieved in their choice. In the city where the author lived before, the "small dining table" was listed as an annual measure to benefit the people and written into the government work report. From "top design" to implementation, it can be said that parents' anxiety has been alleviated to some extent. But the "pit" has not disappeared. The report mentioned that "the opening place is hidden, and it is quite difficult to fully understand the foundation of the' small dining table' outside the school". Coupled with the education, food and drug supervision, health and other departments, "Jiulong Water Control", management is difficult to form a joint force, so that the symptoms are not cured.
The problem of "small dining table" is not a trivial matter, but not only related to students and parents, but also related to the livelihood of many people who make a living from it. We can't shut it down and punish it at once, but we should focus on the long term, combine unblocking and blocking, ban irregularities, maintain norms, and promote the healthy development of the "small table" market.
From a deeper perspective, the reason why the "small dining table" market is so popular that some lawless elements want to "share a piece of cake" is because of the problem of "school is over at half past three". In addition to trusteeship, "overwhelmed" parents can't think of a better way to arrange their children.
20 18 Minister of Education Chen Baosheng once said in the "Ministerial Channel" of the National People's Congress that it is necessary to explore ways to solve the problem of "finishing school at 3: 30" by relying on social forces. In this regard, many beneficial explorations have been made in various places in recent years, with the focus on schools. For example, some schools introduce after-school delay service, and children who can't go home temporarily are managed by the school, and school teachers can give homework guidance; Some schools hold after-school interest classes, and children voluntarily participate; Others establish normalized campus social worker (volunteer) services and community hosting free services, or establish school-enterprise joint hosting free services.
Judging from the practice results in various places, the effect is not bad, which not only eliminates the worries of parents, but also lowers the temperature of the fiery "small table" market. However, this also involves the work of school staff. Of course, after-school delay service cannot be done by volunteers and teachers consciously, otherwise it will lack sustainability.
Managing the "small dining table" is not only a problem of the "small dining table" itself, but also a whole chain involving the interests of schools, parents and other parties. Only when the "small dining table" is no longer the only choice for children after school can the situation of "small dining table" be greatly alleviated. Under the long-term supervision mechanism, the market tends to be rational and benign, giving parents more choices and better protection for their children.