Seeing this title, it is easy to remind people of the brain-dead era in the 1980 s and 1990 s when "people who made atomic bombs were not as good as those who sold tea eggs." Although there is no distinction between entrepreneurship and occupation, college students who have received many years of higher education can only start from setting up stalls when starting a business, which makes people feel a little sad, from which we can see several metaphors-
First of all, under our existing education system, the innovative ability of talents is insufficient. Most of our education from primary school advocates memory, lacking in in-depth guidance and thinking, and even after we arrive at university, we receive pure theoretical education. The lack of innovative consciousness of talents directly reflects that college students can only choose simple trade activities when starting a business.
Secondly, under the existing conditions, college students' entrepreneurship, especially knowledge-based entrepreneurship, lacks better financing channels and market planning support. If college students set up stalls to accumulate experience and capital, how much use can such experience bring to future entrepreneurship? It is even more distant to accumulate capital by setting up stalls. When capital accumulates, opportunities are missed. Many college students have good ideas and creativity, but they lack the experience of translating ideas into practical actions, which is the most needed support.
In addition, our preferential policies should be aimed at innovative and high-tech entrepreneurial behavior, and should be specific industries rather than specific people. If the existing tax support policies are only for college students, even college students can enjoy all kinds of preferential policies and even publicity and support from public opinion, but it is unfair to other people who also set up stalls.