Has the burden on schools and teachers been reduced? On the one hand, there is an education evaluation system, which requires schools to make achievements (local governments and parents actually evaluate schools according to students' learning situation), on the other hand, there are documents to reduce the burden, which require quality education to be promoted, and both sides have inspections and evaluations. For this kind of inspection and evaluation, schools and teachers spend a lot of energy on obtaining materials to cope with the inspection, and the pressure of non-teaching is far greater than that of teaching. Has the burden on students and parents been reduced? In reality, reducing the burden has caused a double burden on students and parents. First, the academic burden has increased.
The overall burden on students has not been reduced by reducing the burden. The reason is that students are evaluated and admitted according to their rankings. In the highly competitive educational environment, reducing the burden on schools will inevitably lead to an increase in the burden off campus. Second, the economic burden will increase, and the training expenditure of many families will become the most important household consumption expenditure, which also causes new educational unfairness. To really reduce the burden, for schools and teachers, it is to implement and expand the autonomy of schools, and we cannot use various administrative indicators to assess running schools, nor can we use various inspection and evaluation to interfere with teachers' teaching, running schools and teaching responsibilities.
Students should be educated according to the educational requirements of this education stage. For example, compulsory education should cover all compulsory education courses, and each course should be taken seriously, so that students can receive a complete compulsory education, instead of running schools and teaching around further education. For students and parents, to reduce the burden, it is necessary to reform the education evaluation system and talent evaluation system, and no longer include all students in a track competition. A single evaluation system, a single successful choice, and fear of becoming a loser make students and parents extremely anxious. Only by establishing a multi-evaluation system and giving students a variety of choices to become talents can they alleviate their anxiety and really reduce their burden.
Moreover, the real burden reduction does not mean that students don't work hard, but that every student finds a path suitable for their own development and success. For example, students who are good at math study hard and even attend Olympic math training classes, while students who are not interested in math but are interested in art can only learn very simple math and spend more time developing their interest in art. This will reduce the mental pressure and burden of studying according to a standard regardless of personality and interest. In my opinion, it is to reduce the burden on students who have not attended extracurricular remedial classes and have not increased their extracurricular exercises.
However, this is not necessarily a good thing for such students. Under the policy of reducing the burden, the amount of teaching and homework in the school has dropped sharply. However, the sharp drop in teaching volume and homework volume does not mean that the intensity of competition among students has dropped sharply: in order not to fall behind in the fierce educational competition, many students have enrolled in extra-curricular remedial classes or enrolled in more extra-curricular remedial classes. In addition, students will also do various extracurricular exercises from extracurricular tutoring books and teaching AIDS. Some students, though unable to attend extracurricular remedial classes, attach great importance to extracurricular exercise.
So for these students, their burden is not reduced, but increased. However, it did reduce the burden on some students. They are students who not only don't attend extracurricular remedial classes but also don't do extracurricular exercises. Without extracurricular remedial classes and extracurricular exercises, the amount of teaching and homework in schools plummeted, and their burden was naturally reduced. But because of this, their academic competitiveness is often lower than those students with heavy academic burden, so they are more likely to be at a disadvantage in future study, which will drag down their future.
In the final analysis, reducing the burden is simply a false concept: whether it is reduced or not, high-quality educational resources are still in short supply and academic competition is still fierce. If you want to stand out in the fierce competition, you must study hard. And those students who really reduce their burdens are more likely to fall behind in the fierce competition. Therefore, advise all students: If you are not really gifted, don't lighten the burden! The burden reduction will be mentioned every year, but it will soon return to the past. I started working on 1990. Remember 1993, I began to reduce the burden. Slogans rang out one after another and many measures were taken.
For example, there is no written homework in grade one or two, half an hour in grade three or four and one hour in grade five or six; Such as directing office control; If the teacher is severely punished, the teacher's morality will veto it by one vote. However, the actual situation is that there is no written homework in grades one and two, and oral homework is left; Other grades require parents to arrange for half an hour, and teachers to arrange for half an hour ... I don't know when it started, and reducing the burden became one of the corruptions of teachers' morality, which was caused by teachers. The teacher is so bad, so much homework is assigned, parents say; What happened to your teacher? I don't know that excessive schoolwork burden will affect students' physical and mental health.
Does the teacher like to assign homework? Don't teachers know that students' health comes first? If it is only because of teachers and study, reducing the burden does not need to be shouted every year, and it does not work every year, which has become a social focus and social problem. If there is no need to assess teachers and schools with students' grades, teachers and schools will not assign homework and will not increase students' academic burden. Experts called on the higher education authorities to stipulate that grades should not be used as the basis for evaluating teachers and schools. Well, it should be changed to morality, ability, diligence and achievement. The teaching achievement accounts for 80%, and the school supervises at the end of the year, and the last five scores are rejected by one vote.
If all students can master knowledge in school, which teacher will assign homework so as not to increase students' academic burden? But the teaching materials are never easy to set up, and the capacity is too large. Who asked? Last semester, it was known from top to bottom that the study time was short, which was the shortest semester, 87 days, but did the teaching materials decrease? If you don't look at the scores of the senior high school entrance examination and college entrance examination, you won't miss high school because of 1, and you won't be able to go to a famous university because of 0. 1. No parent will let your children go to cram school and study at twelve o'clock in the evening. Lighten the burden, treat the symptoms rather than the root cause. Shout for another twenty years, or shout!
Summary:
If you still believe in reducing the burden, you can only say that your cognition is still in the news, in the policy, in the discussion of others, and in a "utopia" you hope. Reducing the burden is to reduce children's learning burden, reduce children's repetitive homework, reduce learning beyond children's cognitive level, and reduce advanced learning. It should not reduce the part that children should learn. Basic knowledge learning, interest learning, improving learning, broadening horizons learning and improving learning in an all-round way. And many parents think that reducing the burden is to subtract all the studies and let the children play happily. Are you kidding?
In any era, any country, any region, education has never been an easy task. In order to let children relax completely, the surrounding support system needs to be strong and perfect. Under the present circumstances, only the family can make it as perfect and complete as possible, and parents are still in the news. How can they give their children the most valuable companionship? Parents' attitude is not correct, objective, positive and comprehensive, so it is naturally impossible to give their children an ideal input of educational concepts. Reducing the burden is not to reduce time, but to reduce repetitive and unqualified homework and study. Can't parents understand this accurately?
Reducing the burden of education has always been a topic of great concern. First of all, the decisive network will explain what is to reduce the burden of education. How to reduce the burden of education, so that students can no longer bear the expectations of parents and teachers, the pressure of busy homework and exams. Only one primary school has started the "burden reduction" action. They use information technology to develop a series of online homework functions based on students, so as to reduce students' learning burden and make learning easier. However, after the "two sessions" on 20 18 this year, the education of reducing the burden has been implemented among junior and senior high school students.
Can reducing the burden of education really reduce the burden on students? If a person is not born in a rich family and wants to change his fate, the ancients said that it is reading. The college entrance examination is one of the watershed for China students, one of the thresholds for entering universities, and also a very important threshold. And if you want to get good grades in the college entrance examination, you must rely on your own efforts. In the past "cramming" education system, poor children or students from ordinary families were undoubtedly the biggest beneficiaries.
They can't attend expensive cram schools, training courses, etc. Like children from rich families after class. They can only try to follow the teacher's rhythm and keep doing problems to increase the question bank in their minds. At that time, students can change their own destiny. As long as they work hard and study hard, they still have a chance to get into a good university. Here, the decisive network should clarify that the decisive network is not an educational method that advocates "cramming". After the education burden reduction began, the school hours became shorter, the children's free time became longer, and the school hours changed from 6: 07 to 3: 04.
At that time, parents must take their children home, otherwise they don't know where the children will sneak away. Children from wealthy families can learn more skills after school, as long as they can afford the tuition; But where should poor families and ordinary families go? In the past, there was a school that helped to look after children. School hours are early now, and parents have to go to work. Children don't know if they will learn badly, and they may even be in danger, which may lead to one of their parents quitting to take care of their children. Therefore, after reducing the educational burden, students can stop working hard at school.
More need the support of parents' money and energy. Everyone has a different starting line. As long as children from rich families continue to attend cram schools and training classes after class, children from poor families can only be immersed in games. A truth from ancient times to the present is also the expectation of every parent for their children, that is, if the young don't work hard, the old will be sad. No parents want their children to play games after school. With the intensification of social competition, the demand for getting into a good university is increasing.
Reducing the burden of education is a good system for students, but in this unfair society, the college entrance examination is fair, and he is not very optimistic about many people. Quality education and happy education bring children, but ignore parents. Children are happy at school, but what the school has undertaken in the past has been transferred to parents. Reducing the burden on the country will only increase the burden on parents, and children often lead the same life.