The excellent model essay of the debate draft is displayed on a special topic.
Does the development of science and technology outweigh the disadvantages, or does the disadvantages outweigh the advantages? In this class, let's have a debate around this topic!
Little lark's trick
Carefully plan and prepare the debate. The preparation before the debate is mainly divided into three aspects: first, we must repeatedly scrutinize our own arguments to ensure the correctness of the arguments; Second, we should collect and master relevant examples to support our arguments; Third, we should test and scrutinize the language repeatedly to make the expression clearer and more accurate, and try not to let the other side? Take advantage of loopholes? .
Organize activities to create an atmosphere of debate. Before the debate begins, the classroom can be arranged as a debate venue and divided into two squares according to their respective positions; At the same time, it is necessary to clarify the basic procedure: opening the argument? Free debate? Concluding remarks; During the debate, team members should cooperate closely, seize the opportunity, and prevent the phenomena of grabbing words, wrangling and losing control of emotions.
Know yourself and yourself, and improve the quality of debate. Know yourself and know yourself, and you will win every battle. In the stage of thinking and discussion, we should boldly assume the angle and content of the other party's cut-in, and find out the reasons and sentences for refutation in advance, so as to give refutation or necessary supplement in time during the debate.
Speak eloquently
In favor: Our debaters agree that the advantages of scientific and technological development outweigh the disadvantages. It is the development of science and technology that promotes the progress of mankind, and it is the development of science and technology that gives mankind this brand-new and beautiful life. Throughout the ages, which dynasty and which generation did not attach importance to the development of science and technology? Look at the four great inventions, which are unique; Look at the astronomical calendar and marvel; Look at Zhaozhou Arch Bridge, which is beautifully designed; A glimpse of the oriental masterpiece compendium of materia medica: look at the value of pi, seven decimal places; Overlooking the Silk Road and developing the economy; Blue and white porcelain is very famous overseas. Scientific and technological development is the road to a strong country and the first driving force for the progress of the Chinese nation. How can we live a happy life today without science? Without science and technology, how can we have a comfortable material life and spiritual enjoyment? Without the progress of science and technology, how can you eat hybrid 2? Where can I wear cotton-padded jacket? Where can we live in a tall building?
Counterparty: It is undeniable that modern technology has brought us some comfort and convenience, but the benefits it brings are not enough to make up for the disadvantages it brings. The invasion of various viruses, the exhaust gas behind cars, the exhaust gas from factories and so on are all infringing on our beautiful home. Why is our home threatened? Why are trees being cut down in large numbers? Why is the air no longer fresh? All this is caused by technology. How can human beings live comfortably without a beautiful environment? If people don't remedy their mistakes quickly, mankind will eventually be destroyed by science and technology.
Founder: In ancient times, people were superstitious about ghosts and gods, and thought that human life was decided by heaven, and birth and death were controlled by heaven. In modern times, people have proved that superstition is not desirable through the development of science and technology, and they should create their own lives through their own hands. In ancient times, many people were seriously ill, and doctors could do nothing but watch the patients die painfully; But now, with the development of science and technology, most intractable diseases have been successfully cured, so people don't have to worry about getting sick? The above example is just the tip of the iceberg of the case that scientific and technological development benefits mankind. The rapid development of science and technology is unimaginable to ancient people. How is the dream of flying for thousands of years round? It is the development of science and technology! What makes communication convenient? It is the development of science and technology! Why can a seriously ill person be reborn? It is the development of science and technology! If the development of science and technology is wrong, then why do inventors and scientists such as Galileo, Newton, Edison, Madame Curie and Einstein dedicate their precious lives to science? Why spend so much precious time? A mistake? In your career? Have they no judgment? Who thinks that their efforts are worthless, and who thinks that their persistence in science is meaningless?
Counterparty: The development of science and technology has brought benefits to our lives, which we have not denied, but we believe that the disadvantages brought by science and technology outweigh the benefits. First of all, although cars are convenient for us to travel, their exhaust gas causes environmental pollution and affects human health. Secondly, the appearance of entertainment facilities such as television brings convenience to people, but it also virtually blocks the communication between people, making human feelings weak. What's more, the emergence of the Internet has given some lawless elements the opportunity to disrupt people's lives? How can we turn a blind eye to a series of side effects brought by high technology?
White lies are beautiful. When we tell some little lies for the happiness and hope of others, lies become understanding, respect and tolerance, which has magical power. Lies out of good wishes are the nourishment of life and the source of faith. It makes people ignite the fire of hope from their hearts and make sure that there is love, trust and emotion in the world.
Mother likes to eat shrimp meat, but always gives it to her dear daughter, saying that she likes bitter shrimp heads. On this day, my mother brought out a pot of hot shrimp, and fresh and tender shrimp meat appeared in front of her daughter. My mother has to cook some other dishes. She wants to catch shrimp meat, but my mother always eats shrimp heads. She thought, the shrimp head must be delicious. I'll try it, too. My daughter grabbed the shrimp head, ate it, and spit it all out. She asked her mother why she likes to eat shrimp heads. Mom said:? I'm a guy who likes to eat. ?
White lies can make people find more reasons to laugh at life. White lies endow humanity with spirituality, reflect the delicacy of emotions and the maturity of thoughts, and urge people to be strong and persistent, to fight for it involuntarily, and finally to overcome their fragility and survive. This kind of lie is not cheating, nor does it have ulterior motives. This kind of lie is understanding, respect, tolerance, magic and free from impurities.
What is this? Honesty? Honest and trustworthy. The ancients have long advocated it? Honesty? And then what? Letter? , emphasizing the consistency of words and deeds and the unity of knowledge and action; The principle of good faith requires people to consciously abide by the law and be sincere and trustworthy. But none of them simply ask people to tell the truth 100%. It is extremely terrible to tell the truth regardless of the situation: can we tell our military information to the enemy during the war? Can you tell your business secrets to your competitors in the mall? Therefore, since the principle of good faith is not equal to the simplified 100% truth, the good faith concealment when necessary will not conflict with the principle of good faith.
As a correct and friendly way of life, white lies have different motives, purposes and results. Honesty? Consistent. The significance of promoting honesty in society lies in cultivating people's noble moral sentiments and establishing mutual trust and mutual benefit among people, and those white lies full of goodwill and compassion are used to make feelings more harmonious, life more warm and society more harmonious. ? The road to university ends in perfection? Out of the same goodwill.
Adults teach children not to lie, but many people forget to tell them that there is still a kind of white lie in the world. Kind people think about how many times we have told white lies, in order not to embarrass others, to make others uncomfortable, and to make themselves feel ashamed, but we are kind people!
The world is not so pure, and innocence is scarce. All people who ask for innocence are naive. Most people who pursue innocence are deceptive, and too many people who tell the so-called truth are shameless.
A white lie. The focus is on goodwill, which will be valuable.
To sum up, I repeat our point of view:
First, lies can be divided into malicious fraud and good faith concealment according to their essential differences, and the two cannot be confused.
Second: White lies conform to the principle of good faith from purpose to result. The two are closely unified.
Many people believe that talents are more likely to appear in adversity. As we all know, there will be many talents in good times.
If you live in an extremely remote and poor mountain village, but I have received a good education since childhood. Every day, my knowledge is growing in constant accumulation. On the other hand, opponents lie leisurely on the hillside every day, thinking about how to drive the sheep home smoothly after the sun goes down. Day after day, when I learned how to communicate with foreigners in English, my opponent finally learned how to communicate with your sheep in one language. Sit in front of the computer at night and discuss with people all over the world through the internet: how do metal nanoclusters break through the limit of 300 degrees Celsius? At the same time, the opponent's defensive friend's home has just been unfortunately washed away by a sudden rainstorm and is shivering in a makeshift air-raid shelter. So who is most likely to become a talent in a few years? Of course, what I said was only a hypothesis, which was intended to state an objective fact, and I didn't mean to satirize everyone at all.
I think everyone has heard of Edison, right? When Edison 12 years old, because he liked it? Drumming? Science prank, expelled from school by the principal for being playful. This made Edison's young mind suffer a great blow. However, her mother knows her son's interests best, and she doesn't think his son may do nothing. He created good conditions for his son, opened a laboratory for Edison, supported children's small scientific experiments, and fully developed Edison's inventive intelligence. Finally, he invented incandescent bulbs, telegraphs, phonographs, etc., and discovered the phenomenon of thermionic emission. If Edison's mother didn't allow him to make small inventions, I'm afraid Edison wouldn't have achieved so much!
In fact, the essence of growing up and producing talents is the same. Prosperity and adversity are also a life course. The most important thing is whether people are diligent and interested in learning. Du Mu, an ancient poet in China, is an example. Du Mu, born in a rich family, received a good education since childhood and had a successful career when he was young. He and Li Shangyin are called by later generations? Little Du Li? . There are Wen Tianxiang, Zhou Enlai, Lu Xun and others. Doesn't this prove that good years can produce talents? This is enough to prove that good times make talents!
First of all, I want to talk about the definition of a gentleman:
1: A truly intelligent and courageous person,
2. People who have achieved great things and promoted the development of history.
3. An open-minded and ambitious person.
4. A person who is calm and can tolerate all evil in the world.
Through the above definition, then a:
A gentleman should be a wise man first, and a fool obviously can't call him a hero. People who would rather die than be humiliated (a scholar can be killed but not humiliated) are obviously more heroic than those who are flexible, but their contribution to the country and great achievements obviously cannot be equated with flexibility, and the inner strength of the latter is even greater than the simple fearless sacrifice spirit of the former. Emphasis on humiliation, with amazing perseverance to the ultimate success.
Two: anyone who pushes history forward. Han Xin, humiliated by cheating, is a model of resilience. ? A gentleman can bend and stretch? This proverb has also spread to this day! Gou Jian, the King of Yue, tried his best. In the end, Wu was destroyed and became a powerful country in the Jianghuai area. Gou Jian, the King of Yue, also became the overlord in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period. What if they say so? Can a scholar be killed without humiliation? And death (it's much easier to get it all), then, can Han Xin still be a famous hero? And does Gou Jian still have the same glory as after he tasted courage? You have to say what his purpose is, why deny their contribution with ulterior motives? It is precisely because they have perseverance and toughness that ordinary people do not have that they can achieve great things. Wouldn't it be easier to get rid of death in that case?
Third: in today's society, flexible people are more likely to achieve great things.
In today's society, peace and development are two major themes. Today's brave people also have different meanings. They can create more wealth for the society! Make your own contribution to social development. ? Would rather die than surrender? This spirit can't adapt to the current social situation. What problem can blind love solve? But an open-minded person can avoid many unnecessary disputes. Don't care about trifles, but never bow to evil forces, and open and close freely.
Fourth: Our flexibility is not just a matter of bending.
Please pay attention to the opposite side here. Our? Bear the burden of humiliation? It is based on the load. A truly brave person should be smart enough to endure the most embarrassing insults. Humiliation is different from flattery and humiliation, but a noble and difficult effort. Tolerance, kindness, so? The benevolent is invincible? . Why is it invincible? Why is it invincible? But benevolent people don't care about villains. They fight for generations, not for temporary anger. They did it to help the poor, not for personal benefit.
Finally, we also have something to say about the indomitable spirit emphasized by other debaters. Don't you always emphasize our spirit? We not only live forever in spirit, but also preserve our strength and bear the burden of humiliation on the basis of spiritual eternity. Wouldn't it be better to win the final victory? Can't you let your spirit empty? More earth-shattering The spirit is there, and so is success. We want spirit, we want success!
There are five positive aspects in the excellent model essay in the debate: judging from the Yue incident, self-destruction should be judged.
Opposing party: Judging from the Xiaoyueyue incident, from ruin should not be sentenced.
Thank you, Chairman!
Hello, judges, classmates and other debaters!
The other debater listed a series of similar cases around the Yue incident, trying to make everyone accept it? Should I be sentenced? This concept, but we have been firmly adhering to it? Freedom from destruction should not be punished? ! Let me sum up our views again.
First, alienation is a moral issue, and people's behavior should not be regulated by law instead of morality.
As we all know, being brave is a noble act that conforms to justice and morality, while giving up on oneself is an act that violates morality and justice and is hated by people. Being brave and avoiding reputation, whether it is a moral problem or an uncertain obligation to help, can be regarded as a hero and praised, but avoiding reputation is a crime and will be punished by criminal law. How unfair and unjust this is! We don't think we should use law instead of morality to regulate people's behavior and put people in prison from ruins. On the contrary, it will reduce the gold content of doing good, raise the threshold of morality, lead to the decrease of people's enthusiasm for doing good, weaken their sense of justice, and let more people follow? Watch the party? Become? Escape party.
Second, if from ruin is sentenced, the boundary between law and morality will be confused.
We who study law all know that laws are formulated by the national legislature and enforced by the state, while morality exists in public opinion and people's beliefs, is driven by people's inner beliefs, is influenced by public opinion and traditional customs, and is enforced by spirit. If self-destruction is sentenced, then in order not to commit the crime of self-destruction, people will have to help each other to die and be brave. In this way, the change from voluntary morality to passive compulsory legal obligation not only changes the nature of the behavior itself, but also improves the moral evaluation standard of the behavior? Will anyone be proud of not committing crimes as a very noble thing? Obviously, the other debater didn't consider this behavior of confusing the boundaries between morality and law, which would lead to incorrect moral public opinion orientation.
Third, from the perspective of legislation and judicial practice, penalty? From the crime of destruction? The actual operability of is not strong.
The opposing defense friends think it is necessary and possible to be convicted of destruction. Hypothetically? From the crime of destruction? Once established, what should legislators face first? See death? What is this? Save? What is this? Do not save? Obviously, the law cannot clearly define the problem, and too vague legislation will be unfavorable to judicial practice. The defense friend of the other side has been avoiding the question of obtaining evidence raised by us. However, in judicial practice, public security organs will face the problem of obtaining evidence. Everyone pays attention to the Xiaoyueyue incident, largely because the camera caught 18 passers-by in from ruin, but not every public place has cameras, and the mobility of people in public places is large. It is quite difficult for public security organs to find out who from ruin is. ? Peng Yu case? The case of the hero bleeding and crying is a good example. Therefore, we believe that whether it is legislation or judicial practice, punishment? From the crime of destruction? The operability is not strong.
Fourthly, the penalty of imprisonment in "Suicide" is too heavy, so it is suggested that legislation can be made, but not imprisonment.
For people in danger, there is no legal obligation, only moral obligation. Of course, people have the freedom to choose whether to help or not. We can condemn from destruction and encourage people to be brave, but obviously we can't threaten and force people to bear moral obligations in the name of crime. We believe that from ruin's imprisonment is too heavy, which violates the modern concept of rule of law and the legislative trend of modern national punishment mitigation. It is suggested to legislate from the ruins to solve the problem in other more harmonious ways.
Judges and classmates, through the previous debate and our discussion, do you still think that from the standpoint of another defense friend, from ruin should be sentenced? Then, the next bleeding hero is probably you! In order to avoid this situation, we insist that desertion should not be sentenced!
?