Not that? Boys should be poor and girls should be rich. ? This is the perfect way to raise children. Some parents think that only girls need to learn some talents such as dancing and musical instruments, but I think boys also need to invest some money in training, so as to make their children's future road wider and wider, help cultivate their talents and horizons, and lay a good foundation for marriage and entrepreneurship in the future. Sometimes boys need it, too dressed up? Yes, isn't it only for girls? Face project? We don't encourage children to keep up with the joneses, but sometimes on some important occasions, formal attendance not only reflects children's manners, but also helps to cultivate their self-confidence and communication skills.
Under the stick comes a dutiful son. ? It's already the training method of the older generation, which may not be suitable for the children now. With the development of society, children's living environment, contact surface and vision have increased a lot. They all have their own ideas and judgments. If parents blindly impose their own ideas on their children, they will not be recognized by their children, but will have rebellious psychology. If they disagree, they will treat their children? Fight? Will make their relationship with their parents more and more alienated, and their children will be protected by law. Even the parents of children should not hit their children. Moreover, it does not mean that only by beating the child will the child honor his parents in the future. Now I think this statement is completely unfounded.
A strict teacher makes a noble apprentice? This kind of education method has certain basis, but it can't be ignorant in the process of educating children? Strict? Plus encouragement and rewards, children will have more confidence in learning and trust teachers.