First, the topic is 99% success. This statement seems absurd, but it is actually a warning. The intellectual difference between people is not as great as imagined. If you are willing to work hard for it and embrace a thriving research direction, you will certainly grow. Following a research direction at sunset is doomed to death. Three factors should be paid attention to in selecting a topic: first, clear scientific issues or key technical issues, and the research content should be clear at a glance; Secondly, it has theoretical inspiration and technical application prospect; Third, it is innovative and competitive, and there seems to be no similar research.

Second, research significance and research status. Cut the crap. The significance of the research lies in pointing to the key points. The more you talk, the less confident you are. The discussion of the research status quo is appropriate and concise, and it is forbidden to look like a Christmas tree from a distance and a grocery store from a distance. It is enough to list 30-50 references, and list about 200. You won't touch anyone but yourself. Youshu medicine

Third, key scientific issues should be focused. Is it still critical to have more than five key scientific problems? "Key" is the core and the most important, with no more than three questions. Such as research objectives, contents and schemes. I don't need to go into details.

Fourth, the team organization does what it can. With the implementation of the restriction of no more than three scientific research projects hosted or participated by senior professional titles, nominal indicators have become scarce resources. It is almost impossible for full professors to host or participate in projects without two or three. Associate professor is eager to fly, especially cherishing feathers. A doctor without a professional title is the first choice for holding a group to keep warm. Try to piece it together. I don't think it's possible to hold your thighs and lean on your head all the time. It is estimated that it is not uncommon for students without senior titles to apply, which is well known.

Fifth, the research foundation should be bright? Suksuke

In the basic part of our work, we have always opposed flattery and self-flattery, but we must also oppose unprincipled modesty and prudence. Count the beans carefully. What contribution have you made? What is the breakthrough? One, two, three, four ... The general project mainly examines the research results in the past three years, and few guys can really get their hands on it. Try it, the big knife is cut on the devil's head. How come? I also want to break through the time limit to make up the number, which is really a death wish. But then again, we are all smart people, so don't show people what we can't put on the table.