Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational institution - 3,000 words of general criticism of the army
3,000 words of general criticism of the army
The military's general self-criticism book has 3,000 words and four words.

Comrade chief:

In the past three days, through the patient enlightenment and education of instructors and platoon leaders, the enthusiastic criticism and help of comrades in the class, and my fierce ideological struggle, I have some understanding of my mistakes. I think it is very bad to continue to distort the facts and resist criticism. I decided to tell the truth to the leaders and check my thoughts, which not only educated myself, but also made other comrades take warning.

The story goes like this: On the morning of August 5th, the monitor sent XX and me to the vegetable field on the south hillside to mow the grass and have a rest. We are joking. I call him "Pockmarked XX". XX was very unhappy and whispered, "Fuck you!" I grabbed a clod the size of an egg and threw it at him. At the same time, I said, "It's really ten hemp and nine evils!" That piece of soil is hitting XX on the shoulder. He was even more angry, waving his fist at me and shouting, "I'll kill you!" " "I saw that he was aggressive, so I punched him first. He immediately rushed up and threw me down, and they scuffled on the vegetable field. I am bigger and harder than him, which hurts him. He broke free and ran away. I pretended to be the winner, pointing to his distant back and saying loudly, "Go back to the company and sue me. I will contact you better next time!" "Back to the company, the monitor first criticized me for being unreasonable. I immediately distorted the facts and put forward a dangerous argument. I quibbled, "I didn't call him' Pockmarked X', but called him' X Jing' in Changsha dialect. I didn't hit him, he hit me first. He scolded my mother first and hit me twice before I hit back. I tried to drive him away, which was a victory in self-defense. "Thought so I wouldn't be wrong. Later, you talked to my platoon leader and instructor many times and criticized me for being dishonest. I always stand up and blame Hao. Now that I think about it, what I did was very wrong.

Why did I make such a mistake? After repeated reflection, I think there are the following reasons:

First, I was loved by my grandparents and parents since I was a child. At home and among my neighbors, I always like to argue irrationally. Everyone saw me. I'll tell you three points. My mother often teaches me: "If someone scolds you, you can hit him twice. Now honest people are in a hurry! " I think she has a point. Later, no matter in school, in the street or in the army, I never thought about being an honest man who suffered. This time, I took the nickname of XX's physical defect, which was originally immoral behavior that didn't respect other people's personality, and I lost my mind. But I still have to fight and "get cheap", which led to a major mistake.

Second, I don't study law seriously, and my legal concept is very weak. Although I have conducted legal education in middle schools and the army in recent years, I have never listened to lectures properly. I always think I don't break the law, so why study law? As a result, the platoon leader said it was illegal to beat Hao, but I thought it was common for comrades to fight. Don't scare me with the law.

Third, I never consider how to respect others ideologically. Before joining the army, I didn't even respect my parents and teachers. I didn't understate it or say it seriously, which made my mother cry many times. After joining the army, I looked down on comrades from the countryside like XX. It was under the guidance of this thought that he was called "Pockmarked X" Happy that day.

Fourth, my vanity is too strong. Not only can I not "lose" at all, but it is not easy for me to admit my mistake. If you do something wrong, you must do everything possible to weave and deny it. Therefore, after this mistake, I decided that Hao and I were the only two people on the hillside, so I tried my best to distort the facts and put all the responsibilities on him, and I became a victim myself.

Now I know that the nature of this mistake is serious, which not only hurts comrades, but also smears the collective. The idea that caused me to make a mistake is more dangerous. Those mistakes all have a common feature, that is, "solipsism." Everything regards me as the biggest, the highest and the right. We should also change and distort objective facts on the basis of "I". If these misconceptions are not changed, it will be impossible to correctly handle interpersonal relationships and it will be difficult to make progress. If left unchecked, under certain objective conditions, it will certainly make greater mistakes and plant greater struggles.

I am determined to turn over a new leaf. We should make a review at the class meeting and apologize to Comrade XX. In the future, we should strengthen the concept of law and discipline and strive to be a model of obeying the law.

According to my wrong facts, I should be punished. However, my father wrote that he was on a business trip recently and would stop by the company to see me. I asked the leader to announce the punishment for me after my father left, so as not to worry about me.

The above is my preliminary review, and I hope comrades will further criticize and help.

I am here to convey

Salute!

Reviewed by: XXX

Time: XXX

I especially recommend it.

I especially recommend it.