The advantages of exam-oriented education are:
1. The knowledge points involved in the old textbooks are clear and students can see them at a glance.
2. The examination syllabus is very clear and specific, which is conducive to teachers' mastery of teaching materials and the improvement of students' college entrance examination scores.
3. The arrangement of knowledge is very systematic, which helps students to master the knowledge points in textbooks well and form a more systematic context in students' minds.
Examination-oriented education also has many disadvantages:
1. The knowledge presented to students is boring, and it is difficult to arouse students' interest and subjective initiative. Students study only to passively accept knowledge for exams.
2. Students study hard and master knowledge mainly by memory.
3. Knowledge points are not closely related to life and production practice, and students feel that what they have learned is out of touch with life practice.
4. Take people by scores and hurt students and teachers. Some students were good at other things. Because of their low academic performance, they are regarded as "poor students" by teachers. Because these students are regarded as "poor students", they lose confidence in their teachers and study. Some teachers have done a lot of work, but they were rejected because they didn't get results, so they were not selected first. Therefore, I feel psychologically unbalanced, which makes some diligent teachers feel that "it's useless to do it anyway, it's better not to do it or do it less".
5. Take people by their achievements and force students and teachers to engage in "sea tactics". For grades, students' body and mind, teachers' body and mind are all in a secondary position. What "exam-oriented education" wants is a gourd, and it doesn't matter if "bugs" eat all the leaves! As everyone knows, how can a gourd grow without "leaves"!
6. Because "exam-oriented education" focuses on scores, some key high schools will charge students a high fee for the difference 1 point when enrolling students. This phenomenon makes people feel chilling. In fact, the gap of 1 minute doesn't mean that there is much difference in students' ability, but some students are not online because of the gap of 1 minute, and as a result, there are not a few people who pay high fees. Should the quality of students be measured by money?
7. Scores trigger teacher infighting. They played tricks in class placement, examination arrangement, invigilation and marking, and the scores triggered a "student war" between schools.
8. "Exam-oriented education" forces junior high school education and teaching to only "see" students, and rarely gives students opportunities for independent innovation. The teacher can take whatever he wants in the exam, and then watch the students do it. Such students have lost the ability of autonomous learning under the long-term "gaze" of teachers. In senior high school, without the crutches that teachers "watch", they would not learn, so their grades dropped sharply.
Quality education is much better than exam-oriented education;
1. Knowledge points are hierarchical, from shallow to deep. The content of compulsory courses is simple, reflecting the development of breadth, and the elective courses increase the depth, which is conducive to students' acceptance of knowledge.
2. Contact life and practice. Students can feel the connection between chemistry and life and production. Feel the important role and application of chemistry in life.
3. Some columns have been added in the textbook design, which has improved students' knowledge and stimulated students' interest in learning chemistry and their desire to actively explore the mysteries of chemistry in life.
4. Paying attention to the cultivation of students' ability can provide more comprehensive talents for the society and improve the educational phenomenon of high scores and low abilities.
It is still difficult to promote quality education well and develop along the ideal road:
1. First of all, a considerable number of teachers and students do not have a comprehensive and profound understanding of quality education, which is prone to misunderstanding and side effects in teaching.
2. Secondly, the thinking mode of exam-oriented education has a deep influence on teachers and students, and it is difficult for them to change their ideas and get rid of the influence of exam-oriented education in the implementation of quality education.
3. Under the exam-oriented education system, students' learning is developed under the arrangement of teachers, and they are very dependent on teachers, so they are unable or unwilling to learn independently.
In short, because quality education is still in the stage of exploration and progress, many problems are faced by everyone and should be dealt with scientifically. We can't agree with other people's opinions, let alone sing high-profile songs. Only by looking at the problems existing in the process of quality education objectively and scientifically can quality education go faster and better.