Indirectly discredit civil servants
In order to attract others to apply for civil servants, graffiti education advertisements even claim that you can be admitted to civil servants, give directions and choose a spouse. It is said that civil servants really have so much power to show the way. Moreover, as people who exercise state administrative power and perform state official duties, shouldn't civil servants think about serving the people?
Although the statement of painting education can also make sense, it always feels stale when used here, and even makes people feel that being admitted to a civil servant is like being a local monarch and abusing their rights at will, which naturally makes people feel that civil servants are very bad.
Despise women.
It is undeniable that the welfare of civil servants is good, but not all women will choose to marry them for their welfare, so it is ironic to say that women are vain.
There are vain women, but not all of them are, and it may not be obvious that some women are worse than civil servants, so we must support these civil servants.
Three is not.
A good civil servant who performs state official duties becomes a person who has the power to do whatever he wants, and even becomes a condition for choosing a wife.
Although the advertisement of graffiti education is enough to attract everyone's attention, it is also so incorrect that it will naturally arouse everyone's resistance.
It is understandable that we want to enroll students in the education industry, but it is a bit unacceptable to use such incorrect advertising words to attract attention and achieve the purpose of enrollment. Even let us feel, when did the education industry, which should be a pure land, become like this? It's really unacceptable.