As a part of composition, it is characterized by discrimination and its combination. Discrimination is discrimination and judgment, and analysis is interpretation and judgment.
Over the years, there are 4 analytical questions in the second subject of middle school, with 8 points for each question and a total score of 32 points.
First, the idea of answering questions
First, judge right or wrong according to the conventional judgment questions.
Step 1: Find the breakthrough point, adverbs of attention, related words and key words.
1. Adverbs of degree and related words: in any case, certain, necessary, as long as and as long as.
Consider whether the expression of the topic is narrow, such as "as long as you prepare enough lessons, you can have a good class."
2. Find the key words, and start with the relationship and concept analysis. For example, "school education is a social activity to impart knowledge".
Step 2: Judge right or wrong and make a concrete analysis. There are only "right" and "wrong" answers, and ambiguous answers are not allowed.
Such as "this statement is one-sided", "this statement should be treated in two" and "this statement has both reasonable and unreasonable aspects.
One side "; When analyzing, answer according to the scheme of "show opinions-analyze opinions-summarize opinions".
Second, the answer template
Step one: make a point. "This view is right/wrong." "The above statement is right/wrong."
Step 2: Analyze the viewpoint. This is the core of the whole problem. It needs to be substantial and well-founded.
A. if the view is wrong:
1. Summarize what is wrong. For example, "it violates the core concept of the new curriculum reform." "National purchase is the requirement of quality education.
Students' misunderstanding. "
2. Point out the background of the viewpoint/determine the environment where the analysis topic is located/explain the concept/theory. For example: "In the new curriculum reform,
Under the background of ... ""Experts "refer to teachers who are highly specialized in their own disciplines, while" saints "have.
A knowledgeable teacher. "
3. Analyze the errors in detail. Combining the basic theory and analyzing the theory in detail, there are several ways to answer: (1) explain the correct reason.
About what it should be; (2) Detailed explanation of error theory. For example, a topic that denies discipline should elaborate on discipline.
The concept, function, significance, adverse consequences of constraint and its interaction with positive guidance.
Use;
4. Propose strategies. Combined with the wrong views and practices in the stem of the question, the correct approach is put forward. For example: "In actual teaching, due to
Adhere to the combination of positive education and discipline. Do ... ""Teachers should use the law of attention to organize teaching. ..... ""teach
The choice of learning method is based on. "
B. if the view is correct:
The structure is the same as part A, with slight changes. The specific template is as follows:
1. where is the summary pair;
2. Point out the background of the viewpoint/determine the environment where the analysis topic is located/explain the concept/theory;
3. Analyze the errors in detail;
4. Propose strategies.