The main difference between Chinese and Western educational methods is that China focuses on exam-oriented education, while the West focuses on enlightenment education. In order to meet the exam-oriented education, students must master the subject and do a lot of problems. Enlightenment education pays attention to developing students' imagination and creativity. So which method is superior? I think each has its own advantages: exam-oriented education makes students' basic knowledge more solid, but less creative; Enlightenment education makes students' basic knowledge less solid, but more creative.

In the 40 years after China's reform and opening up, low-end manufacturing industry has been the mainstay of economic development, and exam-oriented education can provide solid knowledge for many engineers and technicians. However, now that we are in a transitional stage, we need innovative talents, and exam-oriented education can no longer meet the demand. Therefore, we must stop the reform of exam-oriented education, separate exam-oriented education from enlightenment education, and cultivate compound talents with relatively solid basic knowledge and strong innovation ability.

All classes in Europe and America have a clear-cut stand, and the elites are crowded together, living in rich areas, investing in schools and libraries by crowdfunding, implementing elite education, inviting the best teachers, and losing their education level to China, while private schools are ahead of China.

The middle class in Europe and America also signed up for a group to keep warm, and used their votes to tilt the government's educational resources towards them to ensure that their children can enjoy high-quality compulsory education. Teachers are not lost in China, but their physical and chemical roots are not as good as those in China.

No one cares about the proletariat in Europe and America. The government implements the policy of "keeping in captivity". Teachers are not as good as China, and they don't want to offend students. They implement the policy of "stocking" students, and the practice depends entirely on themselves.

China's parents provided China University with the best students in the world, but they were delayed by China University. Due to regional differences, they brushed off a large number of outstanding students, political review also brushed off a large number of outstanding students, and high tuition fees also brushed off a large number of outstanding students. Only a small number of outstanding students with rich background and connections survived and received the best education.

Universities in China were not like this in the past. They all want to serve the motherland and contribute to the rise of China. The country also regards them as "scholars". They not only don't pay tuition, but also give them back their wages and jobs, so only those poor people get the reward of "the dead".

Nowadays, China University has forgotten its original intention, implemented the industrialization of education, and regarded students as a tool to make money, so no one wants to settle down and study, and no one will be born, except military schools, mainly poor students.

European and American universities implement elite education. As long as you are an elite, you will be admitted to an elite university. School enrollment is based on the opinions of well-known university professors. You can recruit the students they want, so that the "purity" of the university is not worried by anyone.