Chapter I General Provisions Article 1 These Measures are formulated in accordance with the Education Law of the People's Republic of China and relevant laws and administrative regulations in order to standardize the identification and handling of violations in national education examinations, safeguard the fairness and justice of national education examinations, and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of those who take national education examinations (hereinafter referred to as candidates) and those who engage in and take national education examinations (hereinafter referred to as examination staff). Article 2 The term "national education examination" as mentioned in these Measures refers to the entrance examination for ordinary and adult colleges and universities, the national postgraduate entrance examination, the self-study examination for higher education, etc. , determined and implemented by the administrative department of education of the State Council, undertaken by the approved educational examination institutions, and held uniformly throughout the country. Article 3 These Measures shall apply to the identification and handling of candidates, examination staff and other relevant personnel who take part in the national education examination who violate the examination management regulations and examination room discipline and affect the fairness and impartiality of the examination. The identification and handling of violations in national education examinations should be open, fair, legal and appropriate. Article 4 The education administrative departments of the State Council and local people's governments at all levels shall be responsible for managing and supervising the organization of national education examinations in the whole country or in the local area. Educational examination institutions at all levels that undertake national education examinations are responsible for the specific implementation of relevant examinations, and are responsible for the identification and handling of examination irregularities in accordance with these Measures. Chapter II Identification and Handling of Violation of Discipline Article 5 Candidates who fail to observe the discipline of the examination room and the arrangements and requirements of the examination staff shall be deemed to have violated the examination discipline if they commit any of the following acts:

(1) bringing articles beyond the provisions into the examination room or not putting them in the designated position;

(two) did not take the exam in the prescribed seat;

(3) Answering questions before the start signal of the exam is issued or continuing to answer questions after the end signal of the exam is issued;

(4) Peeping, whispering, exchanging signals or gestures during the examination;

(five) noisy, smoking or other acts that affect the order of the examination room within the scope prohibited by the examination room or the education examination institution;

(6) Leaving the examination room without the consent of the examination staff;

(7) Taking papers, answer sheets (including answer sheets and answer sheets, the same below) and draft papers out of the examination room;

(8) Answering questions with pen and paper other than those specified, or writing names and test numbers in places other than those specified in the test paper, or marking information on the answer sheet in other ways;

(nine) other acts that violate the rules of the examination room but do not constitute cheating. Article 6 Candidates who violate the principles of fairness and justice in the examination, obtain or attempt to obtain answers to test questions or test scores by improper means, and commit any of the following acts, shall be deemed as cheating in the examination:

(a) using written materials or electronic equipment related to the content of the exam to take the exam;

(2) Plagiarizing or assisting others to plagiarize answers to test questions or materials related to test contents;

(3) robbing or stealing other people's test papers and answer sheets or forcing others to provide convenience for plagiarism;

(4) using communication equipment during the examination;

(five) by others to take the exam as an impostor;

(6) Deliberately destroying examination papers, answer sheets or examination materials;

(seven) fill in the name, test number and other information inconsistent with my identity on the answer sheet;

(8) Passing or receiving articles or exchanging test papers, answer sheets and draft papers;

(9) Other cheating behaviors. Article 7 If an educational examination institution or examination staff finds any of the following behaviors during or after the examination, they shall consider that the relevant candidates have cheated in the examination:

(a) by forging documents, certificates, files and other materials to obtain examination qualifications and examination results;

(two) in the process of marking, it is found that there are more than two (including two) papers in the same subject in the same examination room;

(three) the examination room discipline is chaotic, the examination order is out of control, and there is a large-scale examination cheating phenomenon;

(four) the examination staff assisted in the implementation of cheating, which was verified afterwards;

(five) other acts that should be recognized as cheating. Eighth candidates and other personnel should consciously maintain the order of the examination workplace, obey the management of the examination staff, and shall not have the following acts to disturb the order of the examination room and the examination workplace:

(1) Deliberately disturbing the order of examination workplaces such as examination centers, examination rooms and marking places;

(2) refusing or obstructing the examination staff from performing their management duties;

(3) Threatening, insulting, slandering or framing examination staff or other candidates;

(four) other acts that disrupt the order of examination management. Article 9 If a candidate commits one of the violations listed in Article 5, the examination results of this subject will be cancelled. Candidates who cheat in one of the exams listed in Articles 6 and 7 will have invalid scores in all subjects when they sign up for the exam; Candidates who take the self-study examination for higher education may suspend their studies for one to three years at the same time, or postpone their graduation for one to three years, depending on the seriousness of the case. During the suspension period, the test results are invalid. Tenth candidates have one of the acts listed in article eighth, and continue to participate in the examination of this subject, and all the subjects they signed up for at that time are invalid; Candidates and other personnel who violate the regulations on administrative penalties for public security shall be dealt with by the public security organs; If a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility shall be investigated by judicial organs according to law.