First, the number of teachers is huge and the financial burden is heavy. The number of teachers in local institutions should be the largest. Raising teachers' salaries means increasing the financial burden. Raising teachers' salaries includes two aspects: the first is basic salary; The second place is the invisible salary with five insurances and one gold. The increase of basic salary will increase the base of five insurances and one gold, and the financial burden will increase greatly. For cities with better economic development, they have the ability to have rich family resources. However, there are still many areas in China where economic development is relatively backward and finance itself is relatively difficult. How to use the funds to raise teachers' salaries? Second, the return on investment in education is slow, which requires the concept of "planting trees for ten years and educating people for a hundred years". The return on investment in education is very slow. As a local leading cadre, it may take several consecutive relays to do a good job in local education. This requires a spiritual realm of "I don't have to succeed, but I must succeed". Only by being willing to do practical things for local education, rather than going through the motions, can the quality of education in a region be improved. If a local Qi Xin works together, it will naturally concentrate on education, and education will certainly contribute to the development of local economy in the near future. However, compared with investment in economic projects, investment in education has a slow effect. Many people prefer to invest money in economic projects to earn achievements and pave the way for their future. With insufficient investment in education, teachers' salaries will naturally not increase. Third, wages are not equal to income, and the performance of civil servants is much higher than that of teachers. In many areas, teachers' salaries are indeed equal to or even higher than those of civil servants, but their income is far lower than that of civil servants. Teachers, especially those in compulsory education, have only basic salaries. Schools in some areas will have some achievements at the end of the year, but there is basically no other income. However, in addition to wages, civil servants also include subsidies such as travel expenses every month. At the same time, the year-end performance of civil servants is very high, far higher than that of teachers in the same area. The existence and quantity of year-end assessment results directly determine the income gap between teachers and civil servants. Teachers' dissatisfaction with salary is more based on the year-end assessment performance of civil servants. Therefore, if the Ministry of Education supervises "teachers' salaries are not lower than those of civil servants" instead of "teachers' incomes are not lower than those of civil servants", it can not really improve the treatment of teachers.