Simple: not worth it. Personally, I think that the policy of ignorance adopted by the ancient feudal rulers has already included the policy of appeasing the people to a certain extent. What is the policy of protecting the people is nothing more than letting the bottom people live and work in peace and contentment. In essence, the policy of ignorance of the people also wants to achieve this goal, but the policy of comforting the people you mentioned is different from the method adopted by the rulers, but all roads lead to the same goal, and finally the people live and work in peace. However, from the perspective of cost and risk, the policy of appeasing people's hearts is far greater than the policy of obscurantism, so ancient feudal rulers generally adopted the policy of obscurantism for their own interests.

After all, obscurantism has the lowest policy cost and the least risk. In the development of social productive forces, innovation does not need to inspire people's wisdom, but only needs some people to lead some people. Grassroots people are just tools and don't need to have their own ideas. From the perspective of feudal rulers, they hoped that the people would be ignorant and stay at a certain stage, so that they could farm with peace of mind. Before the imperial examination system was fully implemented, culture was really the property of the upper class, and ordinary people had no culture and no academic qualifications. In ancient feudal society, it was always the grass-roots people who supported a few aristocratic groups. This supply system runs through the feudal society of our country for more than two thousand years.

The feudal rulers chose the policy of ignorance, which is the default of the aristocratic groups in the world. They don't want their slaves to have too much wisdom and autonomy. Although slavery was abolished in ancient times, the profession of slavery did not always exist. The ancient feudal ruler himself was the biggest landlord in feudal society, and it can be said that everyone in the world was his slave.

I don't think anyone will consider what these slaves think. After all, his ultimate goal is to hope for world stability. Why does he need complicated policies to protect people? Why not use the simplest and rudest ignorance policy? On the contrary, we have to make many mistakes and spend a lot of energy on policies to protect the people. In ancient times, the nobility has always been the core, and the grassroots people were just their production tools. They don't spend much energy on these grassroots people at all. Their only requirement for the grassroots is to provide enough food and taxes, which is enough.