Not long ago, there was such a case: a music professor served as a judge in a song competition. He gave a player a high score in the preliminary round and a low score in the semi-final. Finally, the player missed the title. The reason is that the professor found out that this player is a student of his "sworn enemy" (another music professor) after the preliminary round.
Why is the contrast between the same person and others so great? This is because the music professor is dominated by his own feelings and pays little attention to the rules of the game-fairness.
2. Application conditions
Nowadays, college students will encounter all kinds of unfair discrimination in job hunting, and the reasons for discrimination are even more incredible. Age and gender discrimination are common, but there are also "surname" discrimination and "blood type" discrimination. When a boy in a private university applied for the position of customer service supervisor, he was rejected because of his surname "Jia", and the company leaders thought it would affect the company's reputation.
A college student also lost his position as an accountant because of his surname "Pei". There is also a well-known domestic company, in addition to indicating the requirements for academic qualifications and work experience, it also requires candidates to have O or B blood types.
The reason is that people with type O and type B blood are calm, have high loyalty and good psychological quality, and are good at controlling the complicated and changeable market environment. All kinds of discrimination have seriously undermined the principle of fair competition in society.
3. Weight
A baker has been buying butter from a farmer's neighbor for a long time. One day, he felt that a package of butter, which should weigh 3 pounds, seemed a little too light.
So he began to weigh butter regularly and found that it was not enough every time, which means he paid more money every time. He was so angry that he began to file a lawsuit with the law enforcement department. In this way, the matter came to the judge.
"Have you no balance?" The judge asked the farmer.
"Yes, your honor, I have a balance." The farmer replied.
"Is there a very accurate weight?"
"No, your honor. I don't need weights. "
"How can you weigh butter without weight?"
"It's simple," the farmer replied. "You see, when the baker buys butter from me, I always buy his bread. I always want the same weight of bread. Use these breads as weights to weigh butter every time. If it is not accurate, it is not my fault, it is his fault. "
So the judge ruled that the farmer was not guilty and the baker had to bear the legal costs.
4. Stone floor and stone Buddha statue
The stone building of a temple, a statue of a stone Buddha worshiped by pilgrims, kept burning incense and was filled with indignation: "You and I are both stones, coming out of the same mountain. Why can you stand on a high place, enjoy the worship of thousands of people and be worshipped by thousands of people? "
The Buddha pondered for a while and smiled and said, "Dear brother, everything in the world is generally fair. You and I do have the same materials and come from the same mountain, but before you came out, the master just scratched you and sent you out.
In the three years since you left, the master has been chopping, chiseling, carving and grinding me continuously, which has made me who I am today. Since we had different experiences before coming out of the mountain, what is unfair about today's fate? "
Step 5 share porridge
Seven people once lived together and shared a big bucket of porridge every day. Sadly, there is not enough porridge to eat every day. At first, they drew lots to decide who would share the porridge, one serving a day. So every week, they are full only one day, that is, the day of porridge sharing. Later, they began to elect a noble person to share the porridge.
Power will lead to corruption, and everyone began to try their best to please him and bribe him, making the whole clique a mess. Then everyone began to form a three-person porridge Committee and a four-person selection Committee, but they often attacked each other and quarreled constantly, and the porridge was all cold in their mouths.
Finally, I came up with a method: divide the porridge in turn, but the people who divide the porridge have to wait for everyone else to pick up the last bowl left. In order not to eat the least, everyone tries to distribute it equally, even if it is uneven, you can only admit it. Everyone is happy and kind, and life is getting better and better.
The same seven people, different distribution systems, will have different ethos. Therefore, if a unit has bad work habits, it must be a mechanism problem, and it must not be completely fair, just and open, nor is it strictly rewarding diligence and punishing laziness. How to formulate such a system is a problem that every leader needs to consider.