I am glad to discuss this meaningful debate with my opponent today. Just now, my opponent's remarks were well-intentioned, but let's calm down and seriously explore the substantive problems behind the phenomenon, and we will find that the reality is not as perfect as we imagined.

Although all of us have been saying that diligence can make up for the shortcomings, this is just an excuse for people to encourage those who have the ability to succeed but just don't work hard. In other words, it is to make excuses for people who have no talent.

Everyone knows China's characteristic Weiqi, but now Weiqi has harmed many families. The reason is that parents don't know that some things can't be worked hard the day after tomorrow. What matters is innate qualifications. Compared with millions of teenagers who are still struggling in the sea of "exam-oriented education" in Wang Yang, the staging of Go is more like walking on an increasingly thin wire rope. But every year, those sunny teenagers like the wind still flock, vowing to bet their youth on tomorrow! It seems that "chess has golden house, chess has Yan Ruyu". How many people are expecting: "to be no.1 time". In the end, it's always a few happy families and a few sad families!

Professionals say that Go is an individual event, and it is almost a competition field between geniuses. The efforts made the day after tomorrow are not unimportant, but they are always dwarfed by the huge innate advantages. Even if we make every effort to cross the threshold of professional chess players, in the long run, the chances of cultivating a talented chess player are slim. In short, the career path cannot be forced, and the top players are more competitive. Cao Xunxuan once said, "If you have no talent, you will never achieve anything until you die. ..... It seems that if you want to reach the peak in Go, you must have excellent qualifications besides being a mentor and a friend. You have no choice but to be forced by the times, which is another factor worthy of attention.

It can be seen that innate qualifications are more important than acquired efforts. So I think there are three reasons:

1. Our innate quality determines our character. As the saying goes, a leopard cannot change his spots. The efforts of the day after tomorrow can only correct the character.

2. Interest is the best teacher, and interest depends largely on people's innate factors, so innate qualifications play a great role in their own development.

3. Congenital qualification often determines a person's ability. Therefore, if the innate qualifications are not good, he may not be able to control the acquired environment. No matter how hard he tried, it was useless. In other words, his efforts may have been in the wrong direction from the beginning.

If you say that the efforts made the day after tomorrow are more important than the innate qualifications, then you can let those people with disabilities or brain disorders return to normal life through the acquired environment. If so, there would be no disabled and mentally retarded children in the world, but it turns out that innate qualifications are more important than acquired efforts.