Nowadays, people's quality is not called quality, but many are called "quotient", such as IQ, EQ, courage quotient, moral quotient, health quotient, legal quotient, adversity quotient and so on. Anyone who used to use other adjectives to express people's quality can now use "business". This "business" is strange. Mathematically speaking, it is the result of division of two numbers, and the usage here is indeed a numerical value. It was originally used to measure IQ, that is, the ratio of intellectual age to actual age multiplied by the value of 100. It's called IQ, which is a western saying. Later, all quotients evolved on this basis, and then a Q, such as EQ, was used to express EQ. It seems that we have mastered the means of making foreign things serve China.

What can the quotient represent? Represents a person's ability in a certain respect. In the past, people always paid too much attention to IQ, thinking that smart people were people who could achieve great things. Later, with the continuous success of people with low academic qualifications in society, people began to doubt the role of IQ in people's success. More and more people think that a person's success does not determine his IQ, but lies in other aspects, such as emotional intelligence. Many people think that people with high emotional intelligence will be comfortable in society, and even have greater prospects than people with high IQ. When people see that the top students in many schools are mediocre, useless or even accomplish nothing in society, those who have average grades in schools and are often listed as "backward generals" can achieve great things and live a decent and chic life, and everyone has a deeper understanding of IQ and EQ. Therefore, many people think that it is better to teach people to use their brains than to let them die studying. They think playful children are smart and naughty children are talented people. People began to cultivate children's wit and flexibility, good at thinking and playing with their mouths. Looking around, there are many children with good eloquence and strong communication skills, and the whole society is full of vitality.

In fact, we can see horribly that many people have moved the way of training the next generation from one extreme to the other. Different from the rigid and inflexible children produced by stick education, democratic education has produced wayward and naughty children. Why can't we fully influence children when educating them? Don't flock to a method when you think it is good, let alone whether it is suitable or not. Even if it is suitable for children, you should not concentrate on training. Children should be independent, but they should also obey the rules. People should have high EQ, and don't lose high IQ. All other "quotients" are indispensable. These quotients are actually included in all aspects of daily training, that is, a person cannot be a person with a single personality, nor can he be a person with a single talent. They must be complicated and changeable. When they have undergone some changes and some factors that are not conducive to their growth appear, we need to know that what is suitable for others may not be suitable for themselves, and it is not just this advantage that others can succeed. As mentioned above, some naughty students can become talents in society. Can you say their IQ is not high? They just don't do well in school. On the contrary, can you say that those with good academic performance must have high IQ? Not necessarily. Think about it, a person with a really high IQ will definitely be a person with a high EQ, because he knows what he should and should not do and how to improve his communication skills with others. Therefore, these "businesses" are actually integrated, unified and even indistinguishable.

When we see that some people are diligent, we will think twice and judge that the difference between him and others lies in his "diligence and business"; When some people are bold, resourceful, decisive and good at grasping the opportunity, their "courage quotient" is particularly high; When it is found that some people are not afraid of criticism, smooth sailing, indifferent to any setbacks, failures and difficulties, and finally succeed, some people come to the conclusion that this person's "adversity quotient" is very high ... In this way, people invented many "quotients" in order to find reasons for success for those successful people. In the end, these quotients can't justify themselves and contradict each other.

The ancients said: Man proposes, God disposes. In fact, in a person's life, success is not only related to a person's ability and struggle, but also inextricably linked with other factors, which can not be solved by any business. We can neither obey the arrangement of heaven, nor succumb to the teasing of fate, nor simply think that with "business", we will not worry about anything.