Legal analysis: as the case may be. The enterprise requires employees to pay liquidated damages not exceeding the training expenses provided by the employer and not exceeding the training expenses that should be shared for the unfulfilled part of the service period. The definition of training fee is also clearly defined, which cannot be fabricated or assumed. There are two points to pay attention to: first, the agreed liquidated damages are not higher than the sum of the training fees paid by the company; 2. The liquidated damages required by the company shall not exceed the training expenses that should be shared for the unfulfilled part of the service period (prorated).

Legal basis: Article 22 of People's Republic of China (PRC) Labor Contract Law. Where an employer provides special training fees for laborers and provides them with professional and technical training, it may conclude an agreement with the laborers to stipulate the service period. If the laborer violates the service period agreement, he shall pay liquidated damages to the employer in accordance with the agreement. The amount of liquidated damages shall not exceed the training expenses provided by the employer. The liquidated damages that the employer requires the laborer to pay shall not exceed the training expenses that should be shared for the unfinished part of the service period. If the employer and the employee agree on the service period, it will not affect the employee's improvement of labor remuneration in accordance with the normal wage adjustment mechanism during the service period.