1, the state issued a "double-drop policy":
This time, the state has issued a double reduction policy, and many policies have been introduced to control the subject training in the compulsory education stage. The relevant policies are as follows: First, off-campus training institutions of disciplines cannot raise funds through listing. Second, the off-campus training institutions of disciplines must turn to non-profit organizations, from filing system to examination and approval system.
This is not only difficult to make a profit, but also unprecedented in supervision. Third, the class time is greatly reduced, and related courses cannot be arranged on holidays, rest days and winter and summer vacations. Fourth, it is not allowed for off-campus training institutions to advertise, which is clearly mentioned in the policy, unfair competition.
2 reasons for prohibiting off-campus training institutions:
① Many training institutions aim at making profits, ignoring the quality of education, exaggerating publicity and inducing students and parents to spend blindly. Some institutions even involve illegal activities, such as linking with enrollment in primary and secondary schools and conducting advanced teaching. These chaos have seriously affected the educational equity and the healthy growth of teenagers.
② Many parents and students rely too much on off-campus training institutions and spend a lot of time and money on them, which not only increases the financial burden of families, but also affects the all-round development of students. At the same time, it also encourages educational anxiety and undermines educational equity.
③ The existence of off-campus training institutions interferes with the normal teaching order of the school to some extent. Some institutions even conduct unfair transactions with schools, which affects the fairness of education.
The significance of cracking down on illegal class-running institutions;
1, maintaining educational equity:
Institutions that crack down on illegal classes can prevent these institutions from using improper means to obtain educational resources, thus ensuring students' opportunities for fair education. For example, some institutions may attract students and parents by bribery, exaggerated publicity and other improper means, which undermines the fairness of education and is unfair to other students and parents.
2, reduce the burden on students and families:
Cracking down on institutions that offer courses in violation of regulations can prevent students and parents from being induced to spend by these institutions and reduce unnecessary economic burden. At the same time, it can also reduce students' schoolwork burden and prevent students from attending too many cram schools and affecting their physical and mental health.
3. Promote the rational allocation of educational resources:
Cracking down on institutions that run classes in violation of regulations can make educational resources flow in a more reasonable direction and avoid wasting resources. For example, some institutions that run classes in violation of regulations may occupy a lot of teachers and teaching resources, resulting in other institutions unable to obtain enough resources to carry out normal educational activities.