Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Education and training - Is there a way out for off-campus training institutions?
Is there a way out for off-campus training institutions?
202 1 This year is a year of fear for teachers and trainers.

From the article "20021Work Points" issued by the Ministry of Education in February this year, it was clearly pointed out that off-campus training institutions should be governed.

Accompanied by it, it is the news of rectification that comes one after another in various places-

After-school delay services launched in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Jiangsu and other places;

The offline institutions launched in Beijing in March were closed for rectification;

Sichuan province directly closes the audit institution 1 month;

Hunan Longshan dispatched 160 people seized 154 plus training institutions;

Shanghai reported two cases of violation of educational advertisements;

For the first time, Hangzhou tried to use big data to standardize training institutions and use big data to score training institutions;

The Ministry of Education prohibits training institutions from illegally training preschool children. ...

Anxiety not only becomes parents' emotion, but also reflects Qian Qian's education.

"Can the organization really go on?"

"Why don't you change careers ..."

Many worries haunt my heart.

Then, in the face of the trend of rectification, what should teachers and trainers do?

Prediction of teaching and training trend

Certification is only the first step of formalization. What really strangles the institution is the strict management of advance payment and teaching content.

Why do you say that? Because although it is a close thing, it is something that needs thinking and hard work to complete.

The limitation of advance payment and teaching content will not only clean up the industry, but also put forward many requirements for the surviving institutions. At present, off-campus training institutions mainly rely on training outstanding students, which is also the profit direction. However, with the further examination of teaching materials, teaching contents and outlines in the teaching and training industry, the positioning of institutions in the future is likely to change.

Off-campus training institutions may become a supplement to on-campus education, and synchronous classes and make-up classes are likely to become a new development direction. To some extent, this reform can reduce parents' training anxiety and respect children's growth law. But for training institutions, it is not so beautiful.

In discipline training, everyone can only "synchronize" and "make up the difference", and the competition has come up, but the teaching content is similar. How to compete for students and gain advantages in the more intense market undoubtedly poses more challenges to colleges and universities.

This is especially true for prepayment management. It is said that advance payment is the "original sin" of the teaching and training industry and the "seven inches" of the institution. Once managed, it will hurt the muscles and bones.

In order to strengthen the management of institutional funds, the government has made many attempts and pilots. For example, it is not allowed to charge tuition fees three months in advance, supervise teaching and training funds, "pay after going to school", and charge tuition fees according to course progress and tuition code. If you haven't paid attention to the operation of institutional funds, you must be vigilant!

Next, the biggest risk in the operation of the education industry is likely to come from "one-time tuition can only be charged for three months"! The direct impact of charging tuition fees for three months at a time on institutions is naturally the difficulty of capital turnover and insufficient cash flow. And it will indirectly have higher requirements for the operational capacity of the organization!

First of all, your enrollment ability should be stronger to ensure a smooth capital chain.

Secondly, the ability to control internal costs is stronger. It is necessary to pay attention to both large expenditures and small costs. In reality, enrollment and cost control are just the weaknesses of many institutions. Colleges and universities not only can't recruit students, but also lack the awareness of cost management.

In the process of industry normalization, normalization of enrollment, normalization of operation and normalization of profit are the abilities that institutional business owners should have and constantly improve, and they are also the key to improve the anti-risk ability of institutions. Trying to achieve the goal through rapid means such as recruiting students from abroad will only make the sinking cost of colleges and universities higher and higher.

Institutions that do not have the ability to acquire customers independently cannot survive for a long time! Relying on external enrollment will only make the pit bigger and bigger!

Education, there is no shortcut. So is institutional management!

The industry is facing strict management, and the key to the long-term survival of institutions is to improve their own quality!