The first is the basic idea of the debate.
It is the basic understanding of debate, that is, the process of making one's views accepted by a third party through expression and refutation in a limited time. Debate has different meanings in the eyes of people from all walks of life.
The second is the principle and method of persuasion.
Language is the most sinister and powerful thing in the world. It can explain the facts clearly, or it can distort the facts and present different States. Debate, on the other hand, is a war without smoke and a sharp weapon to induce people. It is not so much persuasion as bewitch. There is no right way to persuade, only the right way to persuade. Determine whether the persuasion method is appropriate according to the competition situation.
The third is to look back at the debate from the perspective of judgment.
Policy debate is different from non-policy debate. Some newcomers like to make some unreasonable analogies to help demonstrate, but this will cause logical harm and complexity to their arguments. Therefore, they do not advocate temporarily opening the brain hole to think about analogy, and suggest studying it carefully in advance.
The fourth is the value dispute.
According to the classification standard, there are many forms of debate, and the value debate is the conflict of values. Because different people in society have different values, they have different views on things.
The last one is an example.
Debaters can make their own examples and improve their actual combat level, so as to win in the real arena.
Finally, before participating in the debate, the above points can give the debater a relatively perfect training system, so that the debater can better participate in the debate.